拉丁美洲和欧洲辅助生殖技术比较分析（2013年报告数据库）

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.9870557.v1
• 发布日期：2019-09-18
• 文件数：3 个
• 文件总体积：25.09 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assisted_Reproductive_Technologies_in_Latin_America_and_Europe_a_Comparative_Analysis_of_Reported_Databases_for_2013/9870557

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17698925"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17698928"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17698931"

文件清单

• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_3.xls（9.73 KB）

文件总体积 25.09 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory formost countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in LatinAmerica, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.9870557.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assisted_Reproductive_Technologies_in_Latin_America_and_Europe_a_Comparative_Analysis_of_Reported_Databases_for_2013/9870557）。