关于牙脱位的患者导向网络信息的质量和准确性

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Quality and accuracy of patient-oriented web-based information on tooth avulsion
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.19106819.v1
• 发布日期：2022-02-02
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：96.16 KB
• 源站页面：https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_and_accuracy_of_patient-oriented_web-based_information_on_tooth_avulsion/19106819

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Decoding scores and codes.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/33950033"
curl -L -o "Avulsion Dataset.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/33950036"

文件清单

• Decoding scores and codes.pdf（71.45 KB）
• Avulsion Dataset.xlsx（24.70 KB）

文件总体积 96.16 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

Background/Aim Tooth avulsion (TA)
is a severe form of traumatic dental injury. Treatment outcome depends on the
immediate measures taken. Usually, first responders are laypeople and internet
has become a favored platform for them to access health-related information. The
aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, quality, readability and
popularity of patient-oriented web information on emergency management of TA.

Methods Three search engines
(Google, Bing and Yahoo.com) were browsed with six VPNs using ‘knocked out
tooth’, ‘fallen out tooth’ and ‘tooth avulsion’ as keywords. Top 20 results for
each were evaluated. Webpages were included if they had information oriented to
caregivers. They were analyzed for accuracy (cut-off ≥ 95%). Quality of the web
pages was assessed using DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) benchmark. Readability was evaluated using: Flesch-Kincaid
Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog (FOG), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG),
and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI). Popularity was assessed by Alexa Popularity Rank
(APR). Accurate and inaccurate webpages were compared using Chi-square analysis
and Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman’'s correlation between accuracy and popularity
was established. pResults Seventy-two webpages were
included. 23 (32%) were accurate (k = 0.94). Median DISCERN rating for accurate
and inaccurate webpages was 3.0 [2.5–3.0] and 3.0 [2.0–3.0] respectively (p= 0.331).
10(44%) of accurate and 12(24.5%) of the inaccurate webpages had high-quality
JAMA (p=0.089). Median
readability scores for accurate: FKGL (8[6.75-9.2]), FOG (10.6 [9.55-12.3]), CLI (7[6-7]), SMOG (6.7
[6.15-7.5]); and
inaccurate webpages: FKGL (7.85
[6.275-8.525]), FOG (10.55 [8.875-11.425]), CLI (7 [7-8.25]), SMOG (7
[6.2-7.925]). 68(94.5%) and 4(5.5%) webpages had average and difficult readability,
respectively with a significantly higher CLI score in inaccurate webpages
(p=.0035). Median APR was 1,02,538 [26852-1443755] for accurate and 7,63,190 [219799-2992067]
for inaccurate webpages (p=0.163), with no correlation between accuracy and
APR, Spearman rho = -0.241, p (2-tailed) = 0.0704.

Conclusion Relevant webpages were
limited and ha

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.19106819.v1（source: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_and_accuracy_of_patient-oriented_web-based_information_on_tooth_avulsion/19106819）。