不同场景策略的成本效益

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Cost-effectiveness of strategies in different scenarios.
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0086992.t003
• 发布日期：2014-01-27
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：9.73 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Cost_effectiveness_of_strategies_in_different_scenarios_/914966

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1362673"

文件清单

• Table_3.xls（9.73 KB）

文件总体积 9.73 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

1Input data regarding effectiveness within scenarios taken from Table 1.
2Calculated to highest ranked strategy. Negative values indicate additional costs per effectiveness loss; positive values indicate additional costs per effectiveness gain. Strategies were either dominated (d) or undominated (u) by the first-ranked strategy.
3Base-case: 20-year-old-patient with 58.25 years to live [19]; replacement of 80% of removed teeth assumed [26]; 3% discounting rate [18], triangular distribution of probabilities between 95% CI assumed.
4Best-case: Highest evidence-based effectiveness of micro-invasive treatment assumed.
5Worst-case: Lowest evidence-based effectiveness of micro-invasive treatment assumed.
6Years to live: 63.5 [19].
7Years to live: 39.0 [19].
Mean costs (c, €) and effectiveness (e, % of unrestored lesions), ranking of strategies as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Ranking was performed according to costs (strategies with higher costs were ranked lower). Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed separately for lesions of different stages (E2 or D1). Besides the base-case analysis, we performed best- and worst-case sensitivity analyses to explore effects of uncertainty resulting from current evidence. Within these analyses, we varied the transition probabilities of micro-invasively treated lesions based on the 95% CI of calculated Risk Ratios of our meta-analysis. We additionally explored the effects of the patient’s age as well as used discount rates and applied distribution of probabilities for random sampling on the cost-effectiveness estimates.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0086992.t003（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Cost_effectiveness_of_strategies_in_different_scenarios_/914966）。