用于压力性溃疡预防的支撑表面：一项网络荟萃分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention: A network meta-analysis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0192707
• 发布日期：2018-02-23
• 文件数：11 个
• 文件总体积：5.26 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Support_surfaces_for_pressure_ulcer_prevention_A_network_meta-analysis/5920504

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582594"
curl -L -o "S2 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582606"
curl -L -o "S3 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582636"
curl -L -o "S4 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582654"
curl -L -o "S5 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582660"
curl -L -o "S6 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582666"
curl -L -o "S7 File.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582675"
curl -L -o "S8 File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10582687"

文件清单

• S1 File.docx（24.38 KB）
• S2 File.docx（14.68 KB）
• S3 File.docx（16.94 KB）
• S4 File.docx（36.53 KB）
• S5 File.docx（25.00 KB）
• S6 File.docx（24.09 KB）
• S7 File.png（139.38 KB）
• S8 File.docx（17.39 KB）
• S9 File.docx（3.68 MB）
• S10 File.docx（1.27 MB）
• S11 File.docx（14.78 KB）

文件总体积 5.26 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

Background
Pressure ulcers are a prevalent and global issue and support surfaces are widely used for preventing ulceration. However, the diversity of available support surfaces and the lack of direct comparisons in RCTs make decision-making difficult.
Objectives
To determine, using network meta-analysis, the relative effects of different support surfaces in reducing pressure ulcer incidence and comfort and to rank these support surfaces in order of their effectiveness.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review, using a literature search up to November 2016, to identify randomised trials comparing support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. We grouped the support surfaces according to their characteristics and formed evidence networks using these groups. We used network meta-analysis to estimate the relative effects and effectiveness ranking of the groups for the outcomes of pressure ulcer incidence and participant comfort. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of evidence.
Main results
We included 65 studies in the review. The network for assessing pressure ulcer incidence comprised evidence of low or very low certainty for most network contrasts. There was moderate-certainty evidence that powered active air surfaces and powered hybrid air surfaces probably reduce pressure ulcer incidence compared with standard hospital surfaces (risk ratios (RR) 0.42, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.29 to 0.63; 0.22, 0.07 to 0.66, respectively). The network for comfort suggested that powered active air-surfaces are probably slightly less comfortable than standard hospital mattresses (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; moderate-certainty evidence).
Conclusions
This is the first network meta-analysis of the effects of support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Powered active air-surfaces probably reduce pressure ulcer incidence, but are probably less comfortable than standard hospital surfaces. Most prevention evidence was of low or very low certainty, and more research is required to reduce these uncertainties.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192707（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Support_surfaces_for_pressure_ulcer_prevention_A_network_meta-analysis/5920504）。