压力性溃疡预防临床实践指南质量评价

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0155020
• 发布日期：2016-05-06
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：127.49 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Critical_Appraisal_of_the_Quality_of_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_for_Stress_Ulcer_Prophylaxis/3366307

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 Fig.DOC" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/5207776"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.DOC" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/5207779"

文件清单

• S1 Fig.DOC（62.46 KB）
• S1 Table.DOC（65.02 KB）

文件总体积 127.49 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background and Objective
Inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is common in many hospitals. High-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produce better patient outcomes and promote cost-effective clinical care. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of CPGs for SUP.
Methods
A search was conducted for SUP CPGs using PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), guideline websites and Google (until March 1, 2015). The quality of CPGs was independently assessed by two assessors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, and the specific recommendations in the CPGs were summarized and evaluated.
Results
A total of 7 CPGs for SUP were included. The highest median scores were in the clarity of presentation domain (89%), and the lowest median scores were in the editorial independence domain (0%). The rigor of development, stakeholder involvement, and applicability domains all scored below 40%. The specific recommendations for SUP varied, and the recommendations were inconsistent with the supporting evidence.
Conclusions
The overall quality of CPGs for SUP was relatively low, and no specific SUP CPG can be recommended. Not only should the AGREE II instrument be used to determine the quality of CPGs, but also the recommendations should be appraised based on supporting evidence, which would contribute to the development of high-quality CPGs.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0155020（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Critical_Appraisal_of_the_Quality_of_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_for_Stress_Ulcer_Prophylaxis/3366307）。