游戏化众包肺部超声数据集
哈佛医学院创建，含2384个肺部超声视频片段，经专家标注用于B线分类，通过游戏化众包提高标签质量。
基本信息
资源简介
游戏化众包肺部超声数据集
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《arXiv Query: search_query=&id_list=2306.06773v1&start=0&max_results=1》。源站首次发布：2023-06-11。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述：Study Objective: Machine learning models have advanced medical image processing and can yield faster, more accurate diagnoses. Despite a wealth of available medical imaging data, high-quality labeled data for model training is lacking. We investigated whether a gamified crowdsourcing platform enhanced with inbuilt quality control metrics can produce lung ultrasound clip labels comparable to those from clinical experts. Methods: 2,384 lung ultrasound clips were retrospectively collected from 203…
【主题与分类】
主题标签：cs.CY。
【适用方向】
影像类数据可用于医学图像分析模型（检测、分割、分类）的训练与评测，也可用于标注质量与成像参数相关性的研究。
【获取与许可】
源站页面：https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06773v1
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载，适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档，适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务（收技术服务费，非数据销售）
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管，完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集说明
游戏化众包肺部超声数据集 对应论文数据集（arXiv 预印本）。
数据获取指引
- 打开论文页面获取作者与项目信息：https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06773v1
- 论文 Data Availability / Code Availability 章节标注了数据实际托管位置；
- 获取到实际数据链接后，按对应平台标准方式下载。
论文摘要：Abstract:Study Objective: Machine learning models have advanced medical image processing and can yield faster, more accurate diagnoses. Despite a wealth of available medical imaging data, high-quality labeled data for model training is lacking. We investigated whether a gamified crowdsourcing platform enhanced with inbuilt quality control metrics can produce lung ultrasound clip labels comparable to those from clinical experts.
Methods: 2,384 lung ultrasound clips were retrospectively collected from 203 patients. Six lung ultrasound experts classified 393 of these clips as having no B-lines, one or more discrete B-lines, or confluent B-lines to create two sets of reference standard labels (195 training set clips and 198 test set clips). Sets were respectively used to A) train users on a gamified crowdsourcing platform, and B) compare concordance of the resulting crowd labels to the concordance of individual experts to reference standards.
Results: 99,238 crowdsourced opinions on 2,384 lung ultrasound clips were collected from 426 unique users over 8 days. On the 198 test set clips, mean labeling concordance of individual experts relative to the reference standard was 85.0% +/- 2.0 (SEM), compared to 87.9% crowdsourced label concordance (p=0.15). When individual experts' opinions were compared to reference standard labels created by majority vote excluding their own opinion, crowd concordance was higher than the mean concordance of individual experts to reference standards (87.4% vs. 80.8% +/- 1.6; p<0.001).
Conclusion: Crowdsourced labels for B-line classification vi
数据缺失？
依托陕西、四川两大基地，我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系，覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程，为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务？立即联系我们获取专业方案。
