自我报告合并症与药物评估的系统分析
该数据集提供德国COPD队列COSYCONET中自我报告合并症与药物检查的比较方法,包含两种逐步评估策略,适用于大型队列研究验证自我报告诊断的准确性。

基本信息
资源简介
自我报告合并症与药物评估的系统分析
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Systematic Analysis of Self-Reported Comorbidities in Large Cohort Studies – A Novel Stepwise Approach by Evaluation of Medication》。配套论文《Systematic Analysis of Self-Reported Comorbidities in Large Cohort Studies – A Novel Stepwise Approach by Evaluation of Medication》发表于 PLOS ONE(2016),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163408。源站首次发布:2016-10-28。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Objective In large cohort studies comorbidities are usually self-reported by the patients. This way to collect health information only represents conditions known, memorized and openly reported by the patients. Several studies addressed the relationship between self-reported comorbidities and medical records or pharmacy data, but none of them provided a structured, documented method of evaluation. We thus developed a detailed procedure to compare self-reported comorbidities with information on c…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 15 个,合计 331.74 KB。S1 COSYCONET Consortium.DOCX:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,22.33 KB。S1 Ethics Committees.DOCX:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,21.78 KB。S1 Fig.TIF:image/tiff,91.46 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163408。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Genetics、Biotechnology、Science Policy、Immunology、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified。主题标签:cohort studies comorbidities、German COPD cohort COSYCONET、Approach II、concordance scores、Novel Stepwise Approach、self-reported comorbidities、four-level concordance score、medication、information、ICD。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Systematic_Analysis_of_Self-Reported_Comorbidities_in_Large_Cohort_Studies_A_Novel_Stepwise_Approach_by_Evaluation_of_Medication/4128705
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Lucke, Tanja; Herrera, Ronald; Wacker, Margarethe; Holle, Rolf; Biertz, Frank; Nowak, Dennis; et al. (2016). Systematic Analysis of Self-Reported Comorbidities in Large Cohort Studies – A Novel Stepwise Approach by Evaluation of Medication. PLOS ONE. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-01,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Systematic Analysis of Self-Reported Comorbidities in Large Cohort Studies – A Novel Stepwise Approach by Evaluation of Medication
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163408
- 发布日期:2016-10-28
- 文件数:15 个
- 文件总体积:331.74 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Systematic_Analysis_of_Self-Reported_Comorbidities_in_Large_Cohort_Studies_A_Novel_Stepwise_Approach_by_Evaluation_of_Medication/4128705
命令行下载
curl -L -o "S1 COSYCONET Consortium.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699975"
curl -L -o "S1 Ethics Committees.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699981"
curl -L -o "S1 Fig.TIF" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699984"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699990"
curl -L -o "S2 Table.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699993"
curl -L -o "S3 Table.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6699999"
curl -L -o "S4 Table.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6700002"
curl -L -o "S5 Table.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6700008"
文件清单
S1 COSYCONET Consortium.DOCX(22.33 KB)S1 Ethics Committees.DOCX(21.78 KB)S1 Fig.TIF(91.46 KB)S1 Table.DOCX(16.21 KB)S2 Table.DOCX(16.94 KB)S3 Table.DOCX(19.57 KB)S4 Table.DOCX(14.58 KB)S5 Table.DOCX(15.54 KB)S6 Table.DOCX(17.20 KB)S7 Table.DOCX(14.23 KB)S8 Table.DOCX(14.17 KB)S9 Table.DOCX(14.37 KB)S10 Table.DOCX(15.89 KB)S11 Table.DOCX(16.02 KB)S12 Table.DOCX(21.45 KB)
文件总体积 331.74 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Objective
In large cohort studies comorbidities are usually self-reported by the patients. This way to collect health information only represents conditions known, memorized and openly reported by the patients. Several studies addressed the relationship between self-reported comorbidities and medical records or pharmacy data, but none of them provided a structured, documented method of evaluation. We thus developed a detailed procedure to compare self-reported comorbidities with information on comorbidities derived from medication inspection. This was applied to the data of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET.
Methods
Approach I was based solely on ICD10-Codes for the diseases and the indications of medications. To overcome the limitations due to potential non-specificity of medications, Approach II was developed using more detailed information, such as ATC-Codes specific for one disease. The relationship between reported comorbidities and medication was expressed by a four-level concordance score.
Results
Approaches I and II demonstrated that the patterns of concordance scores markedly differed between comorbidities in the COSYCONET data. On average, Approach I resulted in more than 50% concordance of all reported diseases to at least one medication. The more specific Approach II showed larger differences in the matching with medications, due to large differences in the disease-specificity of drugs. The highest concordance was achieved for diabetes and three combined cardiovascular disorders, while it was substantial for dyslipidemia and hyperuricemia, and low for asthma.
Conclusion
Both approaches represent feasible strategies to confirm self-reported diagnoses via medication. Approach I covers a broad spectrum of diseases and medications but is limited regarding disease-specificity. Approach II uses the information from medications specific for a single disease and therefore can reach higher concordance scores. The strategies described in a detailed and reproducible manner are generally applicable in large studies and might be useful to extract as much information as possible from the available data.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0163408(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Systematic_Analysis_of_Self-Reported_Comorbidities_in_Large_Cohort_Studies_A_Novel_Stepwise_Approach_by_Evaluation_of_Medication/4128705)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




