关于在医生-患者沟通中使用决策助推的观点
调查医生和非临床人员对在晚期癌症患者决策中使用沟通助推的看法,包含实验数据和参与者评分。

基本信息
资源简介
关于在医生-患者沟通中使用决策助推的观点
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 2 个文件、合计 346.72 KB,主题涵盖 communication、nudge、336 Mechanical-Turk workers、chemotherapy、hospice care,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Perspectives on using decision-making nudges in physician-patient communications》。配套论文《Perspectives on using decision-making nudges in physician-patient communications》发表于 PLOS ONE(2018),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202874。源站首次发布:2018-09-19。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Patients engaging in shared decision making must weigh the likelihood of positive and negative outcomes and deal with uncertainty and negative emotions in the situations where desirable options might not be available. The use of “nudges,” or communication techniques that influence patients’ choices in a predictable direction, may assist patients in making complex decisions. However, nudging patients may be perceived as inappropriate influence on patients’ choices. We sought to determine whether…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 2 个,合计 346.72 KB。pone.0202874.s001.pdf:application/pdf,94.69 KB。pone.0202874.s002.pdf:application/pdf,252.03 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202874。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified、Developmental Biology、Science Policy。主题标签:communication、nudge、336 Mechanical-Turk workers、chemotherapy、hospice care、decision-making、non-clinician。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Perspectives_on_using_decision-making_nudges_in_physician-patient_communications/7107479
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Fridman, Ilona; Hart, Joanna L.; Yadav, Kuldeep N.; Tory Higgins, E. (2018). Perspectives on using decision-making nudges in physician-patient communications. PLOS ONE. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-30,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Perspectives on using decision-making nudges in physician-patient communications
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202874
- 发布日期:2018-09-19
- 文件数:2 个
- 文件总体积:346.72 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Perspectives_on_using_decision-making_nudges_in_physician-patient_communications/7107479
命令行下载
curl -L -o "pone.0202874.s001.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13081010"
curl -L -o "pone.0202874.s002.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13081016"
文件清单
pone.0202874.s001.pdf(94.69 KB)pone.0202874.s002.pdf(252.03 KB)
文件总体积 346.72 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Patients engaging in shared decision making must weigh the likelihood of positive and negative outcomes and deal with uncertainty and negative emotions in the situations where desirable options might not be available. The use of “nudges,” or communication techniques that influence patients’ choices in a predictable direction, may assist patients in making complex decisions. However, nudging patients may be perceived as inappropriate influence on patients’ choices. We sought to determine whether key stakeholders, physicians, and laypersons without clinical training consider the use of nudges to be ethical and appropriate in medical decision making. Eighty-nine resident-physicians and 336 Mechanical-Turk workers (i.e., non-clinicians) evaluated two hypothetical preference-sensitive situations, in which a patient with advanced cancer chooses between chemotherapy and hospice care. We varied the following: (1) whether or not the patient’s decision was influenced by a mistaken judgment (i.e., decision-making bias) and (2) whether or not the physician used a nudge. Each participant reported the extent to which the communication was ethical, appropriate, and desirable. Both physicians and non-clinicians considered using nudges more positively than not using them, regardless of an initial decision-making bias in patients’ considerations. Decomposing this effect, we found that physicians viewed the nudge that endorsed hospice care more favorably than the nudge that endorsed chemotherapy, while non-clinicians viewed the nudge that endorsed chemotherapy more favorably than the nudge that endorsed hospice care. We discuss implications and propose exploring further physicians’ and patients’ differences in the perception of nudges; the differences may suggest limitations for using nudges in medical decisions.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0202874(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Perspectives_on_using_decision-making_nudges_in_physician-patient_communications/7107479)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




