表6_为质量改进调动登记数据:融合混合方法分析及脊髓损伤应用

脊髓损伤质量改进研究中关于调动登记数据的表6文档,源自融合混合方法分析。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 6
表格quality improvementpatient registry datainterdisiciplinary teamsspinal cord injury (SCI)complex chronic conditions
Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000018314 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-17
版本
v1

资源简介

表6_为质量改进调动登记数据:融合混合方法分析及脊髓损伤应用

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 18.31 KB,主题涵盖 quality improvement、patient registry data、interdisiciplinary teams、spinal cord injury (SCI)、complex chronic conditions,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury.docx》。配套论文《A Look at Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada: Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Registry (RHSCIR)》发表于 The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine(2017),DOI:10.1080/10790268.2017.1387124。源站首次发布:2023-04-03。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:IntroductionThe rising prevalence of complex chronic conditions and growing intricacies of healthcare systems emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary partnerships to advance coordination and quality of rehabilitation care. Registry databases are increasingly used for clinical monitoring and quality improvement (QI) of health system change. Currently, it is unclear how interdisciplinary partnerships can best mobilize registry data to support QI across care settings for complex chronic condition…

中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):引言复杂慢性病患病率的不断上升以及医疗系统日益增长的复杂性,凸显了跨学科合作以推进康复护理协调性和质量的必要性。登记数据库越来越多地被用于临床监测和卫生系统变革的质量改进(QI)。目前,跨学科合作如何最好地调动登记数据以支持复杂慢性病跨护理环境的质量改进尚不明确。 目的我们以脊髓损伤(SCI)作为一种高度破坏性和致残性复杂慢性病的案例研究,其现有登记数据在质量改进方面尚未得到充分利用。我们旨在比较和汇聚来自既往报告和多学科专家的证据,以勾勒出一项有效调动登记数据用于复杂慢性病护理质量改进的策略的主要要素。 方法本研究采用收敛平行数据库变异混合设计,即对系统综述和定性探索的结果分别进行分析,然后同时进行整合。范围综述采用三阶段流程审查了282条记录,最终纳入28篇文章进行分析。同时与多学科利益相关者进行了访谈,包括特定疾病国家登记机构的领导层、国家脊髓损伤社区的成员、脊髓损伤社区组织的领导层,以及一位有脊髓损伤亲身经历者。范围综述采用描述性分析,利益相关者访谈采用定性描述。 结果范围综述共纳入28篇文章,半结构化访谈共纳入11名多学科利益相关者。结果的整合确定了三项关键经验,以促进成功设计和使用登记数据来为质量改进倡议的规划和制定提供信息:提高登记数据的实用性和可靠性;组建由临床倡导者领导的指导委员会;设计有效、可行且可持续的质量改进倡议。 结论本研究强调了跨学科合作对于支持复杂疾病患者护理质量改进的重要性。它提供了实用策略,以确定共同优先事项,从而促进登记数据的实施和持续使用,为质量改进提供信息。本工作的经验可增强跨学科合作,以支持复杂慢性病患者康复护理的质量改进。

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个,合计 18.31 KB。Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,18.31 KB。数据集 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2023.899630.s006。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Rehabilitation and Therapy (excl. Physiotherapy)、Disability Studies、Animal Structure and Function、Health Care、Physiotherapy。主题标签:quality improvement、patient registry data、interdisiciplinary teams、spinal cord injury (SCI)、complex chronic conditions。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table6_Mobilizing_registry_data_for_quality_improvement_A_convergent_mixed-methods_analysis_and_application_to_spinal_cord_injury_docx/22494088

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Krysa, Jacqueline A.; Manhas, Kiran J. Pohar; Loyola-Sanchez, Adalberto; Casha, Steve; Burns, Katharina Kovacs; Charbonneau, Rebecca; et al. (2023). Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury.docx. Frontiers. Dat…

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-02,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/39949153"

文件清单

  • Table6_Mobilizing registry data for quality improvement: A convergent mixed-methods analysis and application to spinal cord injury.docx(18.31 KB)

文件总体积 18.31 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

IntroductionThe rising prevalence of complex chronic conditions and growing intricacies of healthcare systems emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary partnerships to advance coordination and quality of rehabilitation care. Registry databases are increasingly used for clinical monitoring and quality improvement (QI) of health system change. Currently, it is unclear how interdisciplinary partnerships can best mobilize registry data to support QI across care settings for complex chronic conditions.
PurposeWe employed spinal cord injury (SCI) as a case study of a highly disruptive and debilitating complex chronic condition, with existing registry data that is underutilized for QI. We aimed to compare and converge evidence from previous reports and multi-disciplinary experts in order to outline the major elements of a strategy to effectively mobilize registry data for QI of care for complex chronic conditions.
MethodsThis study used a convergent parallel-database variant mixed design, whereby findings from a systematic review and a qualitative exploration were analyzed independently and then simultaneously. The scoping review used a three-stage process to review 282 records, which resulted in 28 articles reviewed for analysis. Concurrent interviews were conducted with multidisciplinary-stakeholders, including leadership from condition-specific national registries, members of national SCI communities, leadership from SCI community organizations, and a person with lived experience of SCI. Descriptive analysis was used for the scoping review and qualitative description for stakeholder interviews.
ResultsThere were 28 articles included in the scoping review and 11 multidisciplinary-stakeholders in the semi-structured interviews. The integration of the results allowed the identification of three key learnings to enhance the successful design and use of registry data to inform the planning and development of a QI initiative: enhance utility and reliability of registry data; form a steering committee lead by clinical champions; and design effective, feasible, and sustainable QI initiatives.
ConclusionThis study highlights the importance of interdisciplinary partnerships t

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fresc.2023.899630.s006(source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table6_Mobilizing_registry_data_for_quality_improvement_A_convergent_mixed-methods_analysis_and_application_to_spinal_cord_injury_docx/22494088)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案