量表反应性分析数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Scale reactivity analysis.
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0326789.t001
• 发布日期：2025-06-25
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：5.63 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Scale_reactivity_analysis_/29405633

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/55649480"

文件清单

• Table 1.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 5.63 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Studies have shown that approximately 30% of patients with Bell’s palsy may experience permanent disfigurement due to muscle weakness affecting facial expressions. The prognosis for Bell’s palsy is often correlated with the degree of impairment in facial nerve function observed in the early stages of the condition. Selecting appropriate assessment tools is essential for the effective treatment and prognosis of patients with Bell’s palsy.
Objective
Examine and compare three scales used to measure Bell’s palsy: the House-Brackmann Grading Scale (HBGS), the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS), and the Modified Portmann Scale (MPS).
Methods
A retrospective study involved 97 patients with Bell’s palsy treated at the authors’ institution from 2021 to 2022. The authors accessed these data for research purposes in February 2025. The patient cohort underwent HBGS, SFGS, and MPS to assess facial nerve function before and after treatment. We compared the results of these three evaluation methods. Additionally, we performed correlation analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of the post-treatment data to examine the relationships between HBGS and SFGS and between HBGS and MPS, using the internationally recognized and most widely utilized HBGS as the standard.
Results
The HBGS demonstrated moderate consistency with both the FSGS and MPS, revealing significant negative correlations (r = −0.876, P Conclusion
HBGS, SFGS, and MPS are all appropriate tools for assessing Bell’s palsy. The severity of facial nerve palsy can be clinically classified using a transect score of 68 on the SFGS and 16 on the MPS. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, as objective indicators were not utilized as criteria.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0326789.t001（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Scale_reactivity_analysis_/29405633）。