成人中风远程康复管理有效性的系统综述

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: A systematic review
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0225150
• 发布日期：2019-11-12
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：1.04 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Effectiveness_of_telerehabilitation_in_the_management_of_adults_with_stroke_A_systematic_review/10294568

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0225150.s001.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18685313"
curl -L -o "pone.0225150.s002.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18685316"
curl -L -o "pone.0225150.s003.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18685319"
curl -L -o "pone.0225150.s004.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18685322"

文件清单

• pone.0225150.s001.docx（21.86 KB）
• pone.0225150.s002.doc（66.05 KB）
• pone.0225150.s003.pdf（105.33 KB）
• pone.0225150.s004.tif（850.71 KB）

文件总体积 1.04 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity and access to timely rehabilitation can reduce morbidity and help patients to return to normal life. Telerehabilitation can deliver rehabilitation services with the use of technology to increase patient options, deliver services more efficiently and overcome geographical barriers to healthcare access. Despite its popularity, there is conflicting evidence for its effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to update the current evidence base on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for stroke.
Methods
A systematic search of databases (Medline Ovid; Embase; Emcare; Scopus; The Cochrane Library; PEDro; OTSeeker) was conducted in April 2018 (updated in October 2018). This review was conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and methodology registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018090445). A modified McMaster critical appraisal tool for quantitative studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, a descriptive synthesis was conducted.
Results
Out of 1868 studies, 13 randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A diverse range of interventions were delivered through a variety of telerehabilitation systems and the effectiveness measured through a myriad of outcome measures. Summarised findings from the heterogeneous evidence base indicate that telerehabilitation may have a positive impact on a range of primary and secondary outcomes. However, despite these positive findings, the current evidence lacks clarity and uniformity in terms of intervention parameters and measurement of outcomes, which limits broader application of these results.
Discussion
Telerehabilitation, as an alternate form of rehabilitation for people with stroke, shows potential. However, due to methodological and practical concerns, an unequivocal recommendation cannot be made. Findings from this review may inform future policies and practices regarding the use of telerehabilitation for stroke patients.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0225150（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Effectiveness_of_telerehabilitation_in_the_management_of_adults_with_stroke_A_systematic_review/10294568）。