S1文件

该数据集包含多发性骨髓瘤治疗偏好的在线离散选择实验调查数据,用于分析恶意参与者对数据质量的影响。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 10
表格robust discussion aroundmultiple myeloma therapiesincluded two setsanalyze data collectedrespondents provided answerschoice patterns expectedhandle bad actorsbad actors lookingsurvey respondents mustquality checks includedhigh model variancebots &# 8221
S1 File

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000593488 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-08
版本
v1

资源简介

S1文件

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 593.49 KB,主题涵盖 robust discussion around、multiple myeloma therapies、included two sets、analyze data collected、respondents provided answers,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《S1 File -》。源站首次发布:2023-10-05。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Background Online administration of surveys has a number of advantages but can also lead to increased exposure to bad actors (human and non-human bots) who can try to influence the study results or to benefit financially from the survey. We analyze data collected through an online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey to evaluate the likelihood that bad actors can affect the quality of the data collected. Methods We developed and fielded a survey instrument that included two sets of DCE questi…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个,合计 593.49 KB。pone.0287766.s002.xlsx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet,593.49 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0287766.s002。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Biotechnology、Evolutionary Biology、Ecology、Developmental Biology、Science Policy、Infectious Diseases。主题标签:robust discussion around、multiple myeloma therapies、included two sets、analyze data collected、respondents provided answers、choice patterns expected、handle bad actors、bad actors looking、survey respondents must、quality checks included。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/S1_File_-/24253370

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Gonzalez, Juan Marcos; Grover, Kiran; Leblanc, Thomas W.; Reeve, Bryce B. (2023). S1 File -. PLOS ONE. Dataset

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0287766.s002.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/42575108"

文件清单

  • pone.0287766.s002.xlsx(593.49 KB)

文件总体积 593.49 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Online administration of surveys has a number of advantages but can also lead to increased exposure to bad actors (human and non-human bots) who can try to influence the study results or to benefit financially from the survey. We analyze data collected through an online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey to evaluate the likelihood that bad actors can affect the quality of the data collected.
Methods
We developed and fielded a survey instrument that included two sets of DCE questions asking respondents to select their preferred treatments for multiple myeloma therapies. The survey also included questions to assess respondents’ attention while completing the survey and their understanding of the DCE questions. We used a latent-class model to identify a class associated with perverse preferences or high model variance, and the degree to which the quality checks included in the survey were correlated with class membership. Class-membership probabilities for the problematic class were used as weights in a random-parameters logit to recover population-level estimates that minimizes exposure to potential bad actors.
Results
Results show a significant proportion of respondents provided answers with a high degree of variability consistent with responses from bad actors. We also found that a wide-ranging selection of conditions in the survey screener is more consistent with choice patterns expected from bad actors looking to qualify for the study. The relationship between the number of incorrect answers to comprehension questions and problematic choice patterns peaked around 5 out of 10 questions.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need for a robust discussion around the appropriate way to handle bad actors in online preference surveys. While exclusion of survey respondents must be avoided under most circumstances, the impact of “bots” on preference estimates can be significant.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0287766.s002(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/S1_File_-/24253370)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案