数据表2:中国晚期野生型鳞状非小细胞肺癌的11种治疗路径效果与成本效益分析

包含中国晚期野生型鳞状非小细胞肺癌11种治疗序列的效果与成本效益数据,基于网络荟萃分析和序贯模型,适用于卫生经济学评估。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 11
表格cost-effectivenesstreatment sequencesequential modelnon-proportional hazard models
Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.PDF

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000143195 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-08
版本
v1

资源简介

数据表2:中国晚期野生型鳞状非小细胞肺癌的11种治疗路径效果与成本效益分析

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 143.19 KB,主题涵盖 cost-effectiveness、treatment sequence、sequential model、non-proportional hazard models,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.PDF》。配套论文《Treatment Paradigms for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: First-, Second-, and Third-Line》发表于 Current Oncology(2012),DOI:10.3747/co.19.1114。源站首次发布:2023-02-24。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:BackgroundA total of 11 treatment sequences for advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer are recommended by Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines, consisting of seven first-line and three second-line treatments. Five of these treatments were newly approved in China between 2021 and 2022. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these strategies from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. MethodsNetwork meta-analysis with non-proportional hazards was us…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个,合计 143.19 KB。Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patien.PDF:application/pdf,143.19 KB。数据集 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1051484.s002。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health、Aged Health Care、Care for Disabled、Community Child Health、Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety、Epidemiology。主题标签:cost-effectiveness、treatment sequence、sequential model、non-proportional hazard models。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness_and_cost-effectiveness_analysis_of_11_treatment_paths_seven_first-line_and_three_second-line_treatments_for_Chinese_patients_with_advanced_wild-type_squamous_non-small_cell_lung_cancer_A_sequential_model_PDF/22153223

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Zhao, Mingye; Shao, Taihang; Chi, Zhuoyuan; Tang, Wenxi (2023). Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patients with advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A sequential model.PDF…

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-06,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patien.PDF" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/39383936"

文件清单

  • Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 treatment paths, seven first-line and three second-line treatments for Chinese patien.PDF(143.19 KB)

文件总体积 143.19 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

BackgroundA total of 11 treatment sequences for advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer are recommended by Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines, consisting of seven first-line and three second-line treatments. Five of these treatments were newly approved in China between 2021 and 2022. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these strategies from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.
MethodsNetwork meta-analysis with non-proportional hazards was used to calculate the relative efficacy between interventions. A sequential model was developed to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for treatment sequences with first-line platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy (SC) with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, sugemalimab or pembrolizumab, followed by second-line docetaxel, tislelizumab or nivolumab. SC and docetaxel were used as comparators for first-line and second-line treatments, respectively. QALY and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were used to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, respectively. Cost-effective threshold was set as USD 19,091. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the best first-line and second-line therapy.
ResultsPembrolizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (PED) was the most effective treatment sequence. QALYs for patients received SC, nedaplatin + SC, tislelizumab + SC, sintilimab + SC, camrelizumab + SC, sugemalimab + SC, pembrolizumab + SC followed by docetaxel were 0.866, 0.906, 1.179, 1.266, 1.179, 1.266, 1.603, 1.721, 1.807; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by tislelizumab were 1.283, 1.301; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by nivolumab were 1.353, 1.389. Camrelizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (CAD) was the most cost-effective. Compared to SC with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, or sintilimab followed by docetaxel, ICERs of CAD were USD 12,276, 13,210, 6,974, 9,421/QALY, respectively. Compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by tislelizumab, the ICERs of CAD were USD 4,183, 2,804/QALY; CAD was dominant compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by nivolumab; The ICER of sugemalimab + SC followed by docetax

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1051484.s002(source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_2_Effectiveness_and_cost-effectiveness_analysis_of_11_treatment_paths_seven_first-line_and_three_second-line_treatments_for_Chinese_patients_with_advanced_wild-type_squamous_non-small_cell_lung_cancer_A_sequential_model_PDF/22153223)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案