估算越南结直肠癌筛查成本效果的数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Estimating cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in Vietnam
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.14865118.v1
• 发布日期：2021-06-28
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：1.58 MB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Estimating_cost-effectiveness_of_screening_for_colorectal_cancer_in_Vietnam/14865118

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Sup Fig 1.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/28609879"
curl -L -o "Sup. Fig 2.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/28609882"
curl -L -o "Sup. Fig 3.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/28609885"
curl -L -o "Sup. Fig 4.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/28609888"
curl -L -o "Sup. Fig 5.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/28609891"

文件清单

• Sup Fig 1.jpg（271.06 KB）
• Sup. Fig 2.jpg（199.98 KB）
• Sup. Fig 3.jpg（381.22 KB）
• Sup. Fig 4.jpg（368.99 KB）
• Sup. Fig 5.jpg（354.40 KB）

文件总体积 1.58 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background:Presently, there are no national screening programs for cancer in Vietnam. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of an annual colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program from the healthcare service provider’s perspective for the Vietnamese population.
Methods:The economic model consisted of adecision tree and aMarkov model. Adecision tree was constructed for comparing two strategies, including ascreening group with aguaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and ano-screening group in general populations, aged 50 years and above. The Markov model projected outcomes over a25-year horizon. The cost-effectiveness outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) represented by costs per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Results:When compared with no screening, ICER was $1,388per QALY with an increased cost of $ 43.98 and again of 0.032 QALY (Willingness to pay $2,590). The uptake rate of gFOBT, cost of colonoscopy, and the total cost of screening contributed to the largest impact on the ICER. PSA showed that results were robust to variation in parameter estimates, with annual screening remaining cost-effective compared with no screening.
Conclusion:Our screening strategy could be considered cost-effective compared to ano screening strategy. Our findings could be potentially used to develop aCRC national screening program.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.14865118.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Estimating_cost-effectiveness_of_screening_for_colorectal_cancer_in_Vietnam/14865118）。