TLIF-MIS vs TLIF-OPEN: 成本评估

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.6967631.v1
• 发布日期：2018-08-15
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：516.87 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/TLIF-MIS_VS_TLIF-OPEN_COST_EVALUATION/6967631

命令行下载

curl -L -o "1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12779453"
curl -L -o "1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12779456"
curl -L -o "1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12779459"
curl -L -o "1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf04.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12779462"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12779465"

文件清单

• 1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf01.jpg（115.51 KB）
• 1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf02.jpg（135.44 KB）
• 1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf03.jpg（129.50 KB）
• 1808-1851-coluna-17-02-0138-gf04.jpg（130.78 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 516.87 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the direct costs of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open technique (OPEN). Methods: The present study is descriptive and retrospective. Sixteen patients with degenerative spinal pathology operated on with the TLIF MIS technique and TLIF OPEN were included over a 13-month period. Days of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, medical care and costs were compared. Results: The mean number of days of hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.3 days with TLIF MIS and 11.1 ± 6.5 days with TLIF OPEN. The blood loss was 307 ± 81.6 ml (range 200400 ml) with TLIF MIS and 803 ± 701.3 ml (range 200-1800 ml) with TLIF OPEN. The surgical time was 320 ± 92.6 minutes (range 210-500 minutes) in TLIF MIS and 372 ± 95.2 minutes (280-540 minutes) in TLIF OPEN. Conclusions: The difference in surgical costs and time between the two procedures was not statistically significant. There was less bleeding during the TLIF-MIS surgery, as well as a correlation between shorter days of hospital stay proportional to bleeding and surgical time, which translates into a reduction in the cost of these items. Level of Evidence III; Analysis based on alternatives and limited costs.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.6967631.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/TLIF-MIS_VS_TLIF-OPEN_COST_EVALUATION/6967631）。