三维外视镜与手术显微镜在经椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术中临床比较的回顾性病例对照研究数据

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table_1_v1_Clinical comparison of three-dimensional exoscope vs. operative microscope in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective case-control study.xls
• DOI：10.3389/fsurg.2022.926329.s001
• 发布日期：2022-07-29
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：101.38 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_v1_Clinical_comparison_of_three-dimensional_exoscope_vs_operative_microscope_in_transforaminal_lumbar_interbody_fusion_A_retrospective_case-control_study_xls/20399859

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_1_v1_Clinical comparison of three-dimensional exoscope vs. operative microscope in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective case-.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/36474588"

文件清单

• Table_1_v1_Clinical comparison of three-dimensional exoscope vs. operative microscope in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A retrospective case-.xls（101.38 KB）

文件总体积 101.38 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

PurposeHere, we sought to determine the safety and feasibility of three-dimensional exoscope (3D EX). We compared data on surgery, complications, postoperative drainage, hematology, and clinical outcomes in the group that underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using an operative microscope (OM) relative to those treated using 3D EX.
MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records on 74 patients who underwent one- or two-level TLIF from August 2019 to October 2020. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and oswestry disability index (ODI). We used analysis of covariance to compare pre- and post-operative erythrocyte count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), and hematocrit (Hct). Independent sample t-tests was used to compare postoperative drainage volume, total blood loss (TBL), visible blood loss (VBL) and hidden blood loss (HBL).
ResultsThere were no significant differences in VAS and ODI scores between the two groups at all time points (all p > 0.05). RBC and HBL did not differ significantly between the two groups (all p > 0.05). There were significant differences in postoperative drainage volume,TBL, Hb, and Hct values when using 3D EX relative to OM in two-level TLIF (all p  0.05). The two groups differed significantly with regards to VBL when used for one- or two-level TLIF (all p Our data show that 3D EX is a suitable alternative to OM in TLIF. Relative to OM, 3D EX has important strengths in reducing perioperative bleeding in two-level TLIF.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.926329.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_v1_Clinical_comparison_of_three-dimensional_exoscope_vs_operative_microscope_in_transforaminal_lumbar_interbody_fusion_A_retrospective_case-control_study_xls/20399859）。