椎间盘内注射康得立酶对比手术或保守治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本-效果分析
该数据集包含腰椎间盘突出症患者接受康得立酶注射与手术或保守治疗的成本-效果分析数据,包括有形成本、无形成本及增量成本效果比。

基本信息
资源简介
椎间盘内注射康得立酶对比手术或保守治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本-效果分析
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation》。配套论文《Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation》发表于 Journal of Medical Economics(2023),DOI:10.1080/13696998.2023.2173465。源站首次发布:2023-02-16。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of intradiscal condoliase injection compared to surgical or conservative treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who are refractory to conservative treatment. We performed the following cost-effectiveness analyses: (I) condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. open surgery from the beginning, (II) condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. endoscopic surgery…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 60.06 KB。ijme_a_2173465_sm4182.xlsx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet,60.06 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.22109065.v1。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Neuroscience、Physiology、Pharmacology、Biotechnology、Ecology。主题标签:Cost analysis、intradiscal enzyme injection、lumber disc herniation、condoliase、I10、I1、I、I18、I19。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost-effectiveness_analysis_of_intradiscal_condoliase_injection_vs_surgical_or_conservative_treatment_for_lumbar_disc_herniation/22109065
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation. Taylor & Francis. Takaki, Shu; Miyama, Hiroshi; Iwasaki, Motoki
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2024-03-21,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Cost-effectiveness analysis of intradiscal condoliase injection vs. surgical or conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation
- DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.22109065.v1
- 发布日期:2023-02-16
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:60.06 KB
- 源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost-effectiveness_analysis_of_intradiscal_condoliase_injection_vs_surgical_or_conservative_treatment_for_lumbar_disc_herniation/22109065
命令行下载
curl -L -o "ijme_a_2173465_sm4182.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/39280738"
文件清单
ijme_a_2173465_sm4182.xlsx(60.06 KB)
文件总体积 60.06 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of intradiscal condoliase injection compared to surgical or conservative treatment for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who are refractory to conservative treatment.
We performed the following cost-effectiveness analyses: (I) condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. open surgery from the beginning, (II) condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) vs. endoscopic surgery from the beginning, and (III) condoliase + conservative treatment vs. conservative treatment. In the first two comparisons with surgical treatments, we assumed that utilities were equal in both groups and estimated the tangible (treatment, adverse events, postoperative follow-up) and intangible (mental and physical burden, and productivity loss) costs based on the existing literature, the medical expense scoring table, and online questionnaire. In the last comparison without surgical treatment, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness.
The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by open surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 701,643 yen, with a reduction of 663,369 in comparison to that of open surgery from the beginning (1,365,012 yen). The average cost per patient of condoliase followed by endoscopic surgery (for non-responders to condoliase) was 643,909 yen, with a reduction of 514,909 in comparison to that of endoscopic surgery from the beginning (1,158,817 yen). ICER was 1.58 million yen/QALY (ΔQALY = 0.119, 95% confidence interval: 0.059–0.180; Δcost = 188,809 yen at 2 years post-treatment).
Condoliase as a first line treatment option ahead of surgical treatment for LDH is superior, from a cost perspective, to surgical treatment from the beginning. Condoliase is also a cost-effective alternative to non-surgery conservative treatment.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.22109065.v1(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost-effectiveness_analysis_of_intradiscal_condoliase_injection_vs_surgical_or_conservative_treatment_for_lumbar_disc_herniation/22109065)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




