腰椎间盘突出症神经根阻滞技术效果比较

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADICULAR BLOCKING TECHNIQUES IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR DISK HERNIA
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.20013775.v1
• 发布日期：2022-06-07
• 文件数：8 个
• 文件总体积：101.40 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COMPARISON_OF_THE_EFFECTIVENESS_OF_RADICULAR_BLOCKING_TECHNIQUES_IN_THE_TREATMENT_OF_LUMBAR_DISK_HERNIA/20013775

命令行下载

curl -L -o "1a8077f66d71a216bc4752ef934377e298dd8edb.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659699"
curl -L -o "3999e52cfa988a7491904e1630adcc217df6c78a.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659702"
curl -L -o "70e9fe49ae17fc5625d4aba295e18c1979f225c8.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659705"
curl -L -o "b8ab7cbae1a3cacd755c128e26579a0cb178f8e7.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659708"
curl -L -o "fd502ba45337f89ad9da1ff1f2a31b5ff041e82e.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659711"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659714"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659717"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35659720"

文件清单

• 1a8077f66d71a216bc4752ef934377e298dd8edb.jpg（18.25 KB）
• 3999e52cfa988a7491904e1630adcc217df6c78a.jpg（16.72 KB）
• 70e9fe49ae17fc5625d4aba295e18c1979f225c8.jpg（15.44 KB）
• b8ab7cbae1a3cacd755c128e26579a0cb178f8e7.jpg（14.83 KB）
• fd502ba45337f89ad9da1ff1f2a31b5ff041e82e.jpg（19.26 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 101.40 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Objective : Compare the interlaminar blocking technique with the transforaminal blocking, with regard to pain and the presence or absence of complications. Methods : Prospective, descriptive and comparative, double-blind, randomized study, with 40 patients of both sex suffering from sciatic pain due to central-lateral or foraminal disc herniation, who did not respond to 20 physiotherapy sessions and had no instability diagnosed on examination of dynamic radiography. The type of blocking, transforaminal or interlaminar, to be performed was determined by draw. Results : We evaluated 40 patients, 17 males, mean age 49 years, average VAS pre-blocking of 8.85, average values in transforaminal technique in 24 hours, 7, 21, and 90 days of 0.71, 1.04, 2.33 and 3.84, respectively; the average VAS post-blocking for interlaminar technique was 0.89, 1.52, 3.63 and 4.88. The techniques differ only in the post-blocking period of 21 days and overall post-blocking, with significance of p=0.022 and p=0.027, respectively. Conclusion : Both techniques are effective in relieving pain and present low complication rate, and the transforaminal technique proved to be the most effective.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.20013775.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COMPARISON_OF_THE_EFFECTIVENESS_OF_RADICULAR_BLOCKING_TECHNIQUES_IN_THE_TREATMENT_OF_LUMBAR_DISK_HERNIA/20013775）。