基于社区的DOT对结核病治疗结果的影响：系统综述和Meta分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Impact of Community-Based DOT on Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0147744
• 发布日期：2016-02-05
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：170.54 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Impact_of_Community_Based_DOT_on_Tuberculosis_Treatment_Outcomes_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis/2573137

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 PRISMA Checklist.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4216375"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4216381"
curl -L -o "S2 Table.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4216387"
curl -L -o "S1 Text.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4216390"

文件清单

• S1 PRISMA Checklist.doc（62.98 KB）
• S1 Table.docx（22.44 KB）
• S2 Table.docx（30.78 KB）
• S1 Text.docx（54.35 KB）

文件总体积 170.54 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Poor adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to prolonged infectivity and poor treatment outcomes. Directly observed treatment (DOT) seeks to improve adherence to TB treatment by observing patients while they take their anti-TB medication. Although community-based DOT (CB-DOT) programs have been widely studied and promoted, their effectiveness has been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to critical appraise and summarize evidence of the effects of CB-DOT on TB treatment outcomes.
Methods
Studies published up to the end of February 2015 were identified from three major international literature databases: Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and EMBASE. Unpublished data from the grey literature were identified through Google and Google Scholar searches.
Results
Seventeen studies involving 12,839 pulmonary TB patients (PTB) in eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine cohort studies from 12 countries met the criteria for inclusion in this review and 14 studies were included in meta-analysis. Compared with clinic-based DOT, pooled results of RCTs for all PTB cases (including smear-negative or -positive, new or retreated TB cases) and smear-positive PTB cases indicated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.11 (1.02–1.19) for all PTB cases and 1.11 (1.02–1.19) for smear-positive PTB cases], and completed treatment [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 1.74(1.05, 2.90) for all PTB cases and 2.22(1.16, 4.23) for smear-positive PTB cases], reduced death [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.44 (0.26–0.72) for all PTB cases and 0.39 (0.23–0.66) for smear-positive PTB cases], and transfer out [pooled RRs (95%CIs): 0.37 (0.23–0.61) for all PTB cases and 0.42 (0.25–0.70) for smear-positive PTB cases]. Pooled results of all studies (RCTs and cohort studies) with all PTB cases demonstrated that CB-DOT promoted successful treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.13 (1.03–1.24)] and curative treatment [pooled RR (95%CI): 1.24 (1.04–1.48)] compared with self-administered treatment.
Conclusions
CB-DOT did improved TB treatment outcomes according to the pooled results of included studies in this review. Studies on strategies for implementation of patient-centered and comm

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147744（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Impact_of_Community_Based_DOT_on_Tuberculosis_Treatment_Outcomes_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis/2573137）。