基于模型的结核病诊断成本效益分析差异：一项系统综述

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Disparities in model-based cost-effectiveness analyses of tuberculosis diagnosis: A systematic review
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0193293
• 发布日期：2018-05-09
• 文件数：6 个
• 文件总体积：868.73 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Disparities_in_model-based_cost-effectiveness_analyses_of_tuberculosis_diagnosis_A_systematic_review/6241112

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s001.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405039"
curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s002.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405042"
curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s003.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405045"
curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s004.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405054"
curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s005.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405060"
curl -L -o "pone.0193293.s006.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/11405069"

文件清单

• pone.0193293.s001.pdf（91.21 KB）
• pone.0193293.s002.pdf（54.78 KB）
• pone.0193293.s003.pdf（132.64 KB）
• pone.0193293.s004.pdf（201.94 KB）
• pone.0193293.s005.pdf（103.98 KB）
• pone.0193293.s006.pdf（284.17 KB）

文件总体积 868.73 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Structural approach disparities were minimally addressed in past systematic reviews of model-based cost-effectiveness analyses addressing Tuberculosis management strategies. This review aimed to identify the structural approach disparities in model-based cost-effectiveness analysis studies addressing Tuberculosis diagnosis and describe potential hazards caused by those disparities.
Methods
A systematic search to identify studies published before October 2015 was performed in five electronic databases. After removal of duplication, studies’ titles and abstracts were screened based on predetermined criteria. The full texts of potentially relevant studies were subsequently screened and excluded when they did not address active pulmonary Tuberculosis diagnosis. Quality of the studies was assessed using the “Philips’ checklist.” Various data regarding general information, cost-effectiveness results, and disease modeling were extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Data pertaining to models’ structural approaches were compared and analyzed qualitatively for their applicability in various study settings, as well as their potential influence on main outcomes and cost-effectiveness conclusion.
Results
A total of 27 studies were included in the review. Most studies utilized a static model, which could underestimate the cost-effectiveness of the diagnostic tools strategies, due to the omission of indirect diagnosis effects, i.e. transmission reduction. A few structural assumption disparities were found in the dynamic models. Extensive disparities were found in the static models, consisting of varying structural assumptions regarding treatment outcomes, clinical diagnosis and empirical treatment, inpatient discharge decision, and re-diagnosis of false negative patients.
Conclusion
In cost-effectiveness analysis studies addressing active pulmonary Tuberculosis diagnosis, models showed numerous disparities in their structural approaches. Several structural approaches could be inapplicable in certain settings. Furthermore, they could contribute to under- or overestimation of the cost-effectiveness of the diagnosis tools or strategies. They could thus lea

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0193293（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Disparities_in_model-based_cost-effectiveness_analyses_of_tuberculosis_diagnosis_A_systematic_review/6241112）。