万古霉素粉末预防脊柱融合术后深部伤口感染的成本效益数据集-58625

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF VANCOMYCIN POWDER FOR DEEP WOUND INFECTION PROPHYLAXIS IN SPINE FUSION
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.14289023.v1
• 发布日期：2021-03-24
• 文件数：8 个
• 文件总体积：579.78 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COST-EFFECTIVENESS_OF_VANCOMYCIN_POWDER_FOR_DEEP_WOUND_INFECTION_PROPHYLAXIS_IN_SPINE_FUSION/14289023

命令行下载

curl -L -o "2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167450"
curl -L -o "2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167453"
curl -L -o "2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167456"
curl -L -o "2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf04.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167459"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167462"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167465"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167468"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27167471"

文件清单

• 2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf01.jpg（100.99 KB）
• 2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf02.jpg（145.59 KB）
• 2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf03.jpg（125.56 KB）
• 2177-014X-coluna-20-01-0038-gf04.jpg（185.12 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_4.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 579.78 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the cost effectiveness of vancomycin powder in the prophylaxis of posterior lumbar spine instrumentation, seeking potential savings. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was performed to evaluate the cost effectiveness. Data were retrieved from patients’ files from March 2016 to April 2017; costs were considered for the procedures, as well as which antibiotic was used. Results: A total of 184 patients were included. Of these, 102 received prophylactic treatment with 1g of cephalothin and 82 received 1g of cephalothin and 1g of vancomycin powder, which was applied to the wound prior to tissue closure. Of the 184 patients, 110 were women (59%) and 74 were men (41%), and the mean age was 55 years (24-77). The participants had a median BMI of 28.9 kg/m2 (19-39). The average cost per hospitalized patient was $3974 USD and the average cost of rehospitalization due to infection was, on average, $7700 USD. The use of vancomycin powder led to cost savings of $75,008.79 USD per 100 posterior spinal fusions performed for degenerative spine. Conclusion: The use of vancomycin powder is a cost-effective option for prophylaxis of surgical site infection in spine fusion. Level of evidence III; Economic and decision analysis.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.14289023.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COST-EFFECTIVENESS_OF_VANCOMYCIN_POWDER_FOR_DEEP_WOUND_INFECTION_PROPHYLAXIS_IN_SPINE_FUSION/14289023）。