外部验证初级保健下呼吸道感染患者肺炎预测模型:个体患者数据元分析

包含8项研究5308名初级保健下呼吸道感染患者的个体数据,用于外部验证6种肺炎预测模型,评估其区分度和校准度。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 14
表格Respiratory Tract InfectionIPDPrimary Care PatientsPrediction modelsAUCalvan VugtCI
External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.001080026 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-08
版本
v1

资源简介

外部验证初级保健下呼吸道感染患者肺炎预测模型:个体患者数据元分析

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 7 个文件、合计 1.08 MB,主题涵盖 Respiratory Tract Infection、IPD、Primary Care Patients、Prediction models、AUC,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis》。配套论文《External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis》发表于 PLOS ONE(2016),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149895。源站首次发布:2016-02-26。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Background Pneumonia remains difficult to diagnose in primary care. Prediction models based on signs and symptoms (S&S) serve to minimize the diagnostic uncertainty. External validation of these models is essential before implementation into routine practice. In this study all published S&S models for prediction of pneumonia in primary care were externally validated in the individual patient data (IPD) of previously performed diagnostic studies. Methods and Findings S&S models for diagnosing pne…

中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):背景 肺炎在基层医疗中仍然难以诊断。基于症状与体征(S&S)的预测模型有助于尽量减少诊断不确定性。在常规实践应用之前,必须对这些模型进行外部验证。本研究在既往已开展的诊断研究的个体患者数据(IPD)中,对所有已发表的用于基层医疗中预测肺炎的S&S模型进行了外部验证。 方法与结果 通过系统检索,确定了用于诊断因下呼吸道感染就诊于基层医疗的成人肺炎的S&S模型,以及用于验证的IPD。共纳入6个预测模型和8项诊断研究的IPD(总N=5308,肺炎患病率12%)。从区分度和校准度两方面对模型进行评估。区分度采用合并曲线下面积(AUC)和delta AUC衡量,后者代表

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 7 个,合计 1.08 MB。S1 TRIPOD Checklist.pdf:application/pdf,142.46 KB。S1 Appendix.pdf:application/pdf,10.19 KB。S1 Protocol.pdf:application/pdf,318.13 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149895。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Microbiology、Genetics、Biotechnology、Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified。主题标签:Respiratory Tract Infection、IPD、Primary Care Patients、Prediction models、AUC、al、van Vugt、CI。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/External_Validation_of_Prediction_Models_for_Pneumonia_in_Primary_Care_Patients_with_Lower_Respiratory_Tract_Infection_An_Individual_Patient_Data_Meta_Analysis/3022831

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Schierenberg, Alwin; C. Minnaard, Margaretha; M. Hopstaken, Rogier; C. van de Pol, Alma; D. L. Broekhuizen, Berna; J. de Wit, Niek; et al. (2016). External Validation of Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Primary Care Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-A…

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-04,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 TRIPOD Checklist.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724590"
curl -L -o "S1 Appendix.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724608"
curl -L -o "S1 Protocol.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724623"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724629"
curl -L -o "S2 Table.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724656"
curl -L -o "S3 Table.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724686"
curl -L -o "S4 Table.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4724698"

文件清单

  • S1 TRIPOD Checklist.pdf(142.46 KB)
  • S1 Appendix.pdf(10.19 KB)
  • S1 Protocol.pdf(318.13 KB)
  • S1 Table.pdf(257.31 KB)
  • S2 Table.pdf(114.02 KB)
  • S3 Table.pdf(124.56 KB)
  • S4 Table.pdf(113.36 KB)

文件总体积 1.08 MB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Pneumonia remains difficult to diagnose in primary care. Prediction models based on signs and symptoms (S&S) serve to minimize the diagnostic uncertainty. External validation of these models is essential before implementation into routine practice. In this study all published S&S models for prediction of pneumonia in primary care were externally validated in the individual patient data (IPD) of previously performed diagnostic studies.
Methods and Findings
S&S models for diagnosing pneumonia in adults presenting to primary care with lower respiratory tract infection and IPD for validation were identified through a systematical search. Six prediction models and IPD of eight diagnostic studies (N total = 5308, prevalence pneumonia 12%) were included. Models were assessed on discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was measured using the pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC) and delta AUC, representing the performance of an individual model relative to the average dataset performance. Prediction models by van Vugt et al. and Heckerling et al. demonstrated the highest pooled AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.74–0.85) and 0.72 (0.68–0.76), respectively. Other models by Diehr et al., Singal et al., Melbye et al., and Hopstaken et al. demonstrated pooled AUCs of 0.65 (0.61–0.68), 0.64 (0.61–0.67), 0.56 (0.49–0.63) and 0.53 (0.5–0.56), respectively. A similar ranking was present based on the delta AUCs of the models. Calibration demonstrated close agreement of observed and predicted probabilities in the models by van Vugt et al. and Singal et al., other models lacked such correspondence. The absence of predictors in the IPD on dataset level hampered a systematical comparison of model performance and could be a limitation to the study.
Conclusions
The model by van Vugt et al. demonstrated the highest discriminative accuracy coupled with reasonable to good calibration across the IPD of different study populations. This model is therefore the main candidate for primary care use.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149895(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/External_Validation_of_Prediction_Models_for_Pneumonia_in_Primary_Care_Patients_with_Lower_Respiratory_Tract_Infection_An_Individual_Patient_Data_Meta_Analysis/3022831)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案