莱姆病经济负担及干预措施成本效益的范围综述

莱姆病经济负担及干预成本效益的范围综述数据集,涵盖北美和欧洲的成本分析及成本-效果分析。

Figshare
2019-01-04 更新
浏览 12
文本, 表格Lyme disease interventionsburdenConclusions Lyme diseaseCEALD vaccinationCAscoping review IntroductionLyme disease10 cost-effectiveness analyses11 cost analyses2017 United States dollars786 M USD
The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review

基本信息

模态
文本, 表格
大小
0.000092413 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2019-01-04
版本
v1

资源简介

莱姆病经济负担及干预措施成本效益的范围综述

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review》。配套论文《The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review》发表于 PLOS ONE(2019),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210280。源站首次发布:2019-01-04。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Introduction While Lyme disease (LD) is mostly treatable, misdiagnosed or untreated LD can result in debilitating sequelae and excessive healthcare usage. The objective of this review was to characterize the body of literature on the economic burden of Lyme disease (LD) and the cost-effectiveness of LD interventions, such as antibiotic treatment and vaccination. Methods We followed Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodologies. We systematically searched terms related to LD, economic eval…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 2 个,合计 92.41 KB。pone.0210280.s001.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,28.41 KB。pone.0210280.s002.doc:application/msword,64.00 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0210280。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Biotechnology、Sociology、Science Policy、Infectious Diseases。主题标签:Lyme disease interventions、burden、Conclusions Lyme disease、CEA、LD vaccination、CA、scoping review Introduction、Lyme disease、10 cost-effectiveness analyses、Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodologies。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/The_economic_burden_of_Lyme_disease_and_the_cost-effectiveness_of_Lyme_disease_interventions_A_scoping_review/7548893

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Mac, Stephen; R. da Silva, Sara; Sander, Beate (2019). The economic burden of Lyme disease and the cost-effectiveness of Lyme disease interventions: A scoping review. PLOS ONE. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-04,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0210280.s001.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14029484"
curl -L -o "pone.0210280.s002.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14029487"

文件清单

  • pone.0210280.s001.docx(28.41 KB)
  • pone.0210280.s002.doc(64.00 KB)

文件总体积 92.41 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction
While Lyme disease (LD) is mostly treatable, misdiagnosed or untreated LD can result in debilitating sequelae and excessive healthcare usage. The objective of this review was to characterize the body of literature on the economic burden of Lyme disease (LD) and the cost-effectiveness of LD interventions, such as antibiotic treatment and vaccination.
Methods
We followed Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodologies. We systematically searched terms related to LD, economic evaluations, costs, and cost-effectiveness in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and the grey literature up to November 2017. We included primary economic evaluations conducted in North America and Europe, reporting LD-related costs or cost-effectiveness of human interventions. Two reviewers screened articles and charted data independently. Costs were standardized to 2017 United States dollars (USD).
Results
We screened 923 articles, and included 10 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) and 11 cost analyses (CA). Three CEAs concluded LD vaccination was likely cost-effective only in endemic areas (probability of infection ≥1%). However, LD vaccination is not currently available as an intervention in the US or Europe. Six studies assessed economic burden from a societal perspective and estimated significant annual national economic impact of: 735,550 USD for Scotland (0.14 USD per capita, population = 5.40M), 142,562 USD in Sweden (0.014 USD per capita, 9.96M), 40.88M USD in Germany (0.51 USD per capita, 80.59M), 23.12M USD in the Netherlands (1.36 USD per capita, 17.08M), and up to 786M USD in the US (2.41 USD per capita, 326.63M).
Conclusions
Lyme disease imposes an economic burden that could be considered significant in the US and other developed countries to justify further research efforts in disease control and management. Societal costs for Lyme disease can be equally impactful as healthcare costs, but are not fully understood. Economic literature from countries with historically high incidence rates or increasing rates of Lyme disease are limited, and can be useful for future justification of resource allocation.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0210280(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/The_economic_burden_of_Lyme_disease_and_the_cost-effectiveness_of_Lyme_disease_interventions_A_scoping_review/7548893)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案