标准与强化实施策略对多重耐药菌警报工具采用的影响：整群随机试验的表格1

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table 1_Standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies to increase adoption of a multidrug-resistant organism alert tool: a cluster randomized trial.docx
• DOI：10.3389/frhs.2025.1566454.s001
• 发布日期：2025-09-18
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：15.50 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Standard_vs_enhanced_implementation_strategies_to_increase_adoption_of_a_multidrug-resistant_organism_alert_tool_a_cluster_randomized_trial_docx/30154789

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 1_Standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies to increase adoption of a multidrug-resistant organism alert tool: a cluster randomized trial.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/58059004"

文件清单

• Table 1_Standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies to increase adoption of a multidrug-resistant organism alert tool: a cluster randomized trial.docx（15.50 KB）

文件总体积 15.50 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

BackgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) launched VA Bug Alert (VABA) to identify admitted patients who are infected or colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in real time and promote timely infection prevention measures. However, initial VABA adoption was suboptimal. The objective of this project was to compare the effectiveness of standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies for improving VABA adoption.
Methods121 VA healthcare facilities were evaluated for adoption of VABA (at least 1 user registered at a facility) April 2021–September 2022. All facilities initially received standard implementation, which included: VABA revisions based on end-user feedback, education, and internal facilitation via monthly meetings with the MDRO Prevention Division of the VHA National Infectious Diseases Service. Surveys evaluated VABA perspectives among MDRO Prevention Coordinators (MPCs) and/or Infection Preventionists (IPs) before and after initial standard implementation. Facilities not registered for VABA following initial standard implementation (n = 31) were cluster-randomized to continue to receive standard implementation or enhanced implementation (audit and feedback reports and external facilitation via guided interviews to assess VABA use barriers). Percentages of facilities adopting VABA at baseline, after standard implementation (Follow-up 1), and after the enhanced vs. standard implementation trial period (Follow-up 2) were assessed and compared across time points using McNemar’s test. VABA adoption was compared by trial condition using Fisher’‘s exact test.
ResultsBefore education, 25% of 167 MPC/IP survey respondents across 116 facilities reported no knowledge/use of VABA. After education, 82% of 92 survey respondents across 80 facilities reported intending to use VABA. At baseline, VABA registrations were 40%. Registrations significantly increased aft Follow-up 1(75%, p Implementation efforts dramatically increased VABA registrations. Incorporating interview feedback to increase VABA’‘s fit with users’’ needs may increase its use and help reduce MDRO spread in VA.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/frhs.2025.1566454.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Standard_vs_enhanced_implementation_strategies_to_increase_adoption_of_a_multidrug-resistant_organism_alert_tool_a_cluster_randomized_trial_docx/30154789）。