二级医疗中细菌感染短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗证据的系统评价概览
系统评价概览,比较二级医疗中细菌感染短疗程与长疗程抗生素的临床有效性,纳入6篇综述(n=3,162)。

基本信息
资源简介
二级医疗中细菌感染短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗证据的系统评价概览
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的文本数据集,收录 4 个文件、合计 583.95 KB,主题涵盖 High quality trials、evidence、RR、resolution rates、review,可用于医学自然语言处理(实体识别、信息抽取等),CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Overview of systematic reviews assessing the evidence for shorter versus longer duration antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections in secondary care》。配套论文《Overview of systematic reviews assessing the evidence for shorter versus longer duration antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections in secondary care》发表于 PLOS ONE(2018),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194858。源站首次发布:2018-03-28。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Our objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness of shorter versus longer duration antibiotics for treatment of bacterial infections in adults and children in secondary care settings, using the evidence from published systematic reviews. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Cinahl. Our primary outcome was clinical resolution. The quality of included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR criteria, and the quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE criter…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 4 个,合计 583.95 KB。S1 Checklist.pdf:application/pdf,199.46 KB。S1 Appendix.pdf:application/pdf,234.93 KB。S2 Appendix.pdf:application/pdf,126.35 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194858。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Microbiology、Pharmacology、Biotechnology、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified、Science Policy。主题标签:High quality trials、evidence、RR、resolution rates、review、duration antibiotic treatment、UTI、duration antibiotics、CI、MEDLINE。
【适用方向】
文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Overview_of_systematic_reviews_assessing_the_evidence_for_shorter_versus_longer_duration_antibiotic_treatment_for_bacterial_infections_in_secondary_care/6055919
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:J. Onakpoya, Igho; Sarah Walker, A.; Tan, Pui S.; Spencer, Elizabeth A.; Gbinigie, Oghenekome A.; Cook, Johanna; et al. (2018). Overview of systematic reviews assessing the evidence for shorter versus longer duration antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections in secondary care. PLOS ONE. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-30,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Overview of systematic reviews assessing the evidence for shorter versus longer duration antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections in secondary care
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194858
- 发布日期:2018-03-28
- 文件数:4 个
- 文件总体积:583.95 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Overview_of_systematic_reviews_assessing_the_evidence_for_shorter_versus_longer_duration_antibiotic_treatment_for_bacterial_infections_in_secondary_care/6055919
命令行下载
curl -L -o "S1 Checklist.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10909862"
curl -L -o "S1 Appendix.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10909865"
curl -L -o "S2 Appendix.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10909871"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/10909874"
文件清单
S1 Checklist.pdf(199.46 KB)S1 Appendix.pdf(234.93 KB)S2 Appendix.pdf(126.35 KB)S1 Table.pdf(23.22 KB)
文件总体积 583.95 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Our objective was to assess the clinical effectiveness of shorter versus longer duration antibiotics for treatment of bacterial infections in adults and children in secondary care settings, using the evidence from published systematic reviews. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Cinahl. Our primary outcome was clinical resolution. The quality of included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR criteria, and the quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE criteria. We included 6 systematic reviews (n = 3,162). Four reviews were rated high quality, and two of moderate quality. In adults, there was no difference between shorter versus longer duration in clinical resolution rates for peritonitis (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.09, I2 = 0%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.08, I2 = 24%), or acute pyelonephritis and septic UTI (clinical failure: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.18). The quality of the evidence was very low to moderate. In children, there was no difference in clinical resolution rates for pneumonia (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.04, I2 = 48%), pyelonephritis (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.04) and confirmed bacterial meningitis (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.11, I2 = 0%). The quality of the evidence was low to moderate. In conclusion, there is currently a limited body of evidence to clearly assess the clinical benefits of shorter versus longer duration antibiotics in secondary care. High quality trials assessing strategies to shorten antibiotic treatment duration for bacterial infections in secondary care settings should now be a priority.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0194858(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Overview_of_systematic_reviews_assessing_the_evidence_for_shorter_versus_longer_duration_antibiotic_treatment_for_bacterial_infections_in_secondary_care/6055919)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




