紧急情况下人类排泄物安全处理和容器的推荐方法评估
评估氯基和石灰基方法对埃博拉和霍乱治疗中心排泄物中细菌和病毒灭活效果的数据集。

基本信息
资源简介
紧急情况下人类排泄物安全处理和容器的推荐方法评估
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings》。配套论文《Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings》发表于 PLOS ONE(2018),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201344。源站首次发布:2018-07-26。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 11 个,合计 1.50 MB。pone.0201344.s001.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,13.48 KB。pone.0201344.s002.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,316.22 KB。pone.0201344.s003.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,691.61 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201344。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Biochemistry、Space Science、Medicine、Biotechnology、Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified、Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified。主题标签:log reduction values、cholera treatment centres、14 litre buckets、Bacteroides fragilis phages、chlorine-based approaches、GB -124PH indicators、HTH、ETC、FC、CTC。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessment_of_recommended_approaches_for_containment_and_safe_handling_of_human_excreta_in_emergency_settings/6869183
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:da Silva, Diogo Trajano Gomes; Dias, Edgard; Ebdon, James; Taylor, Huw (2018). Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings. PLOS ONE. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-01,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0201344
- 发布日期:2018-07-26
- 文件数:11 个
- 文件总体积:1.50 MB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessment_of_recommended_approaches_for_containment_and_safe_handling_of_human_excreta_in_emergency_settings/6869183
命令行下载
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s001.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532289"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s002.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532292"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s003.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532295"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s004.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532298"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s005.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532301"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s006.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532304"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s007.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532307"
curl -L -o "pone.0201344.s008.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/12532310"
文件清单
pone.0201344.s001.docx(13.48 KB)pone.0201344.s002.docx(316.22 KB)pone.0201344.s003.docx(691.61 KB)pone.0201344.s004.docx(287.21 KB)pone.0201344.s005.docx(32.59 KB)pone.0201344.s006.docx(64.55 KB)pone.0201344.s007.xlsx(31.97 KB)pone.0201344.s008.docx(13.78 KB)pone.0201344.s009.docx(14.37 KB)pone.0201344.s010.docx(13.95 KB)pone.0201344.s011.docx(16.87 KB)
文件总体积 1.50 MB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Ebola and cholera treatment centres (ETC and CTC) generate considerable quantities of excreta that can further the transmission of disease amongst patients and health workers. Therefore, approaches for the safe handling, containment and removal of excreta within such settings are needed to minimise the likelihood of onward disease transmission. This study compared the performance and suitability of three chlorine-based approaches (0.5% HTH, NaDCC and NaOCl (domestic bleach)) and three lime-based approaches (10%, 20% and 30% Ca(OH)2). The experiments followed recent recommendations for Ebola Treatment Centres. Three excreta matrices containing either raw municipal wastewater, or raw municipal wastewater plus 10% or 20% (w/v) added faecal sludge, were treated in 14 litre buckets at a ratio of 1:10 (chlorine solutions or lime suspensions: excreta matrix). The effects of mixing versus non-mixing and increasing contact time (10 and 30 mins) were also investigated. Bacterial (faecal coliforms (FC) and intestinal enterococci (IE)) and viral (somatic coliphages (SOMPH), F+specific phages (F+PH) and Bacteroides fragilis phages (GB-124PH)) indicators were used to determine the efficacy of each approach. Lime-based approaches provided greater treatment efficacy than chlorine-based approaches, with lime (30% w/v) demonstrating the greatest efficacy (log reductions values, FC = 4.75, IE = 4.16, SOMPH = 2.85, F+PH = 5.13 and GB124PH = 5.41). There was no statistical difference in efficacy between any of the chlorine-based approaches, and the highest log reduction values were: FC = 2.90, IE = 2.36, SOMPH = 3.01, F+PH = 2.36 and GB124PH = 0.74. No statistical difference was observed with respect to contact time for any of the approaches, and no statistical differences were observed with respect to mixing for the chlorine-based approaches. However, statistically significant increases in the efficacy of some lime-based approaches were observed following mixing. These findings provide evidence and practical advice to inform safe handling and containment of excreta and ensure more effective health protection in future emergency settings.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201344(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessment_of_recommended_approaches_for_containment_and_safe_handling_of_human_excreta_in_emergency_settings/6869183)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




