完整原始数据集
91名受试者三种异位测量方法的原始数据,用于评估Neurolens设备的检查者间重复性。

基本信息
资源简介
完整原始数据集
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Full raw data set.》。源站首次发布:2025-11-20。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Objective Heterophoria is routinely measured during a comprehensive ocular examination. The aim of the current study is to compare the inter-examiner repeatability of the Neurolens measurement device (nMD), a commercially available instrument that objectively assesses phoria, to the inter-examiner repeatability of prism alternating cover test and the von Graefe method. Methods 91young adults aged between 18–60 years were enrolled. Two experienced optometrists assessed phoria on each subject usin…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 24.14 KB。pone.0337126.s001.xlsx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet,24.14 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0337126.s001。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Biochemistry、Microbiology、Molecular Biology、Biotechnology、Evolutionary Biology、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified。主题标签:von graefe method、comprehensive ocular examination、commercially available instrument、18 &# 8211、objectively assesses phoria、91 participants recruited、xlink "> heterophoria、neurolens measurement device、40 cm ).、two traditional methods。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Full_raw_data_set_/30668646
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Skiadopoulos, Denise; Bandstra, Alaina; Kattouf, Valerie; van de Pol, Corina; Labhishetty, Vivek; Singh, Sumeer (2025). Full raw data set.. PLOS ONE. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Full raw data set.
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0337126.s001
- 发布日期:2025-11-20
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:24.14 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Full_raw_data_set_/30668646
命令行下载
curl -L -o "pone.0337126.s001.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/59734137"
文件清单
pone.0337126.s001.xlsx(24.14 KB)
文件总体积 24.14 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Objective
Heterophoria is routinely measured during a comprehensive ocular examination. The aim of the current study is to compare the inter-examiner repeatability of the Neurolens measurement device (nMD), a commercially available instrument that objectively assesses phoria, to the inter-examiner repeatability of prism alternating cover test and the von Graefe method.
Methods
91young adults aged between 18–60 years were enrolled. Two experienced optometrists assessed phoria on each subject using three methods: the von Graefe method (VG), prism alternating cover test (PCT) and nMD. VG and PCT were performed at distance (6m) and near (40 cm). The nMD measurements were obtained using virtual distance (6m) and near (50 cm) targets. All the tests were performed in a single session by both the examiners in a randomized order.
Results
All study participants were students, staff, and faculty of the Illinois College of Optometry. Of the 91 participants recruited, 65 were female. All participants completed the study with no missing data. The repeatability analysis showed nMD (distance: 0.69 ± 0.77PD; near: 1.00 ± 0.98PD) to have the smallest mean absolute difference at both distance and near compared to VG (distance: 3.28 ± 3.18PD; near: 4.48 ± 3.99PD) and PCT (distance: 1.50 ± 2.36PD; near: 4.05 ± 3.69PD). Bland Altmann analysis showed that the phoria measurements from nMD exhibited significantly less variability when compared with VG and PCT.
Conclusions
The Neurolens measurement device (nMD) has the highest inter-examiner repeatability when compared to traditional VG and PCT methods. Given that the measurements are objective and repeatable compared to the two traditional methods, this device has the potential to be a useful addition to current methods of clinical practice.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0337126.s001(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Full_raw_data_set_/30668646)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




