远程青光眼与住院检查用于青光眼筛查的有效性：一项系统综述和荟萃分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：The Effectiveness of Teleglaucoma versus In-Patient Examination for Glaucoma Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0113779
• 发布日期：2014-12-05
• 文件数：3 个
• 文件总体积：59.60 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_The_Effectiveness_of_Teleglaucoma_versus_In_Patient_Examination_for_Glaucoma_Screening_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis_/1262825

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_S1.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1826339"
curl -L -o "Table_S2.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1826340"
curl -L -o "Table_S3.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1826341"

文件清单

• Table_S1.docx（15.97 KB）
• Table_S2.docx（24.38 KB）
• Table_S3.docx（19.25 KB）

文件总体积 59.60 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the world affecting 60.5 million people worldwide in 2010, which is expected to increase to approximately 79.6 million by 2020. Therefore, glaucoma screening is important to detect, diagnose, and treat patients at the earlier stages to prevent disease progression and vision loss. Teleglaucoma uses stereoscopic digital imaging to take ocular images, which are transmitted electronically to an ocular specialist. The purpose is to synthesize literature to evaluate teleglaucoma, its diagnostic accuracy, healthcare system benefits, and cost-effectiveness.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted to help locate published and unpublished studies. Studies which evaluate teleglaucoma as a screening device for glaucoma were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to provide estimates of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, and the relative percentage of glaucoma cases detected. The improvements to healthcare service quality and cost data were assessed.
Results
Of 11237 studies reviewed, 45 were included. Our results indicated that, teleglaucoma is more specific and less sensitive than in-person examination. The pooled estimates of sensitivity was 0.832 [95% CI 0.770, 0.881] and specificity was 0.790 [95% CI 0.668, 0.876]. The relative odds of a positive screen test in glaucoma cases are 18.7 times more likely than a negative screen test in a non-glaucoma cases. Additionally, the mean cost for every case of glaucoma detected was $1098.67 US and of teleglaucoma per patient screened was $922.77 US.
Conclusion
Teleglaucoma can accurately discriminate between screen test results with greater odds for positive cases. It detects more cases of glaucoma than in-person examination. Both patients and the healthcare systems benefit from early detection, reduction in wait and travel times, increased specialist referral rates, and cost savings. Teleglaucoma is an effective screening tool for glaucoma specifically for remote and under-services communities.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0113779（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_The_Effectiveness_of_Teleglaucoma_versus_In_Patient_Examination_for_Glaucoma_Screening_A_Systematic_Review_and_Meta_Analysis_/1262825）。