原发性开角型青光眼的经济学评估

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Economic evaluation of primary open-angle glaucoma
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.9598925.v1
• 发布日期：2019-08-14
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：263.69 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Economic_evaluation_of_primary_open-angle_glaucoma/9598925

命令行下载

curl -L -o "0034-7280-rbof-78-04-0233-gf01-en.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17240144"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17240147"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17240150"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17240153"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17240156"

文件清单

• 0034-7280-rbof-78-04-0233-gf01-en.jpg（241.16 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_4.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 263.69 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility relation of the initial treatment with laser or primary open-angle glaucoma medications (PLA) in Brazil, considering on the one hand the total costs and on the other side the impact on patients’ quality of life. Methods: The study was performed based on a Markov model, where a theoretical cohort of early-stage GPAA carriers was generated. The parameters used in the model were obtained in the literature and included: direct medical costs (consultations, examinations, treatment); direct non-medical costs (accommodation, transportation, meals, companions); indirect costs (related to incapacity for work); utility values (quality of life measured in QALY - quality-adjusted life year); and probability of transition between stages of health. Three treatment strategies were tested in the model: (1) without treatment; (2) initial treatment with eye drops; (3) initial treatment with laser trabeculoplasty. The measure of outcome was the incremental cost-utility ratio (RCUI). The robustness of the model was tested through sensitivity analysis. Results: The strategies (2) and (3) of the initial treatment of POAG generated gains in quality of life in relation to (1) in Brazil. Initiating the laser treatment generated an average gain of 1 QALY, whereas with medication it gave a gain of 2 QALYs on average. Among the three strategies tested, strategy (2) was cost-effective and was dominant over the other strategies, since it was at the same time the cheapest and the most effective strategy. Conclusion: Both laser trabeculoplasty and medications as primary treatments of early-stage POAG have generated significant gains in quality of life. The strategy of starting treatment with medications was cost-effective, whereas laser trabeculoplasty strategy was not cost-effective, when non-medical costs (direct and indirect) are included.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.9598925.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Economic_evaluation_of_primary_open-angle_glaucoma/9598925）。