糖尿病护理任务委托范围综述数据集

该数据集包含1994-2017年45项关于糖尿病护理任务委托给非医生专业人员效果的研究,文本形式呈现,评估血糖控制、患者满意度等结局。

Figshare
2019-10-11 更新
浏览 19
文本scoping review Objectivepatient-centred outcome parametersmethods Systematic searchestype -2 diabetes mellitus patientsequivalent glycaemic controldiabetes caretask delegationGoogle Scholar databasesnon-physician healthcare professionalsnon-physician health professionalscommunity health workers
Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review

基本信息

模态
文本
大小
0.000126502 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2019-10-11
版本
v1

资源简介

糖尿病护理任务委托范围综述数据集

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review》。配套论文《Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review》发表于 PLOS ONE(2019),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223159。源站首次发布:2019-10-11。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Objective As a result of unhealthy lifestyles, reduced numbers of healthcare providers are having to deal with an increasing number of diabetes patients. In light of this shortage of physicians and nursing staff, new concepts of care are needed. The aim of this scoping review is to review the literature and examine the effects of task delegation to non-physician health professionals, with a further emphasis on inter-professional care. Research design and methods Systematic searches were performe…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 2 个,合计 126.50 KB。pone.0223159.s001.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,18.00 KB。pone.0223159.s002.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,108.50 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223159。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Biotechnology、Developmental Biology、Science Policy、Infectious Diseases。主题标签:scoping review Objective、patient-centred outcome parameters、methods Systematic searches、type -2 diabetes mellitus patients、equivalent glycaemic control、diabetes care、task delegation、Google Scholar databases、non-physician healthcare professionals、non-physician health professionals。

【适用方向】

文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Does_task_delegation_to_non-physician_health_professionals_improve_quality_of_diabetes_care_Results_of_a_scoping_review/9972755

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Mirhoseiny, Sanas; Geelvink, Tjarko; Martin, Stephan; Vollmar, Horst Christian; Stock, Stephanie; Redaelli, Marcus (2019). Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review. PLOS ONE. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-03,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0223159.s001.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17979080"
curl -L -o "pone.0223159.s002.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17979086"

文件清单

  • pone.0223159.s001.docx(18.00 KB)
  • pone.0223159.s002.docx(108.50 KB)

文件总体积 126.50 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Objective
As a result of unhealthy lifestyles, reduced numbers of healthcare providers are having to deal with an increasing number of diabetes patients. In light of this shortage of physicians and nursing staff, new concepts of care are needed. The aim of this scoping review is to review the literature and examine the effects of task delegation to non-physician health professionals, with a further emphasis on inter-professional care.
Research design and methods
Systematic searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases to retrieve papers published between January 1994 and December 2017. Randomised/non-randomised controlled trials and studies with a before/after design that described the delegation of tasks from physicians to non-physicians in diabetes care were included in the search. This review is a subgroup analysis that further assesses all the studies conducted using a team-based approach.
Results
A total of 45 studies with 12,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most of the interventions were performed in an outpatient setting with type-2 diabetes mellitus patients. The non-physician healthcare professionals involved in the team were nurses, pharmacists, community health workers and dietitians. Most studies showed significant improvements in glycaemic control and high patient satisfaction, while there were no indications that the task delegation affected quality of life scores.
Conclusions
The findings of the review suggest that task delegation can provide equivalent glycaemic control and potentially lead to an improvement in the quality of care. However, this review revealed a lack of clinical endpoints, as well as an inconsistency between the biochemical outcome parameters and the patient-centred outcome parameters. Given the vast differences between the individual healthcare systems used around the world, further high-quality research with an emphasis on long-term outcome effects and the expertise of non-physicians is needed.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0223159(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Does_task_delegation_to_non-physician_health_professionals_improve_quality_of_diabetes_care_Results_of_a_scoping_review/9972755)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案