英国2型糖尿病血糖控制与治疗差异数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942
• 发布日期：2019-10-07
• 文件数：9 个
• 文件总体积：701.85 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Disparities_in_glycaemic_control_monitoring_and_treatment_of_type_2_diabetes_in_England_A_retrospective_cohort_analysis/9945311

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s001.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916698"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s002.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916701"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s003.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916704"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s004.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916707"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s005.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916710"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s006.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916713"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s007.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916716"
curl -L -o "pmed.1002942.s008.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17916719"

文件清单

• pmed.1002942.s001.docx（35.68 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s002.pdf（233.59 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s003.docx（13.18 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s004.docx（86.43 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s005.docx（27.64 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s006.docx（14.76 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s007.pdf（180.47 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s008.docx（78.53 KB）
• pmed.1002942.s009.docx（31.58 KB）

文件总体积 701.85 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Disparities in type 2 diabetes (T2D) care provision and clinical outcomes have been reported in the last 2 decades in the UK. Since then, a number of initiatives have attempted to address this imbalance. The aim was to evaluate contemporary data as to whether disparities exist in glycaemic control, monitoring, and prescribing in people with T2D.
Methods and findings
A T2D cohort was identified from the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre dataset: a nationally representative sample of 164 primary care practices (general practices) across England. Diabetes healthcare provision and glucose-lowering medication use between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016 were studied. Healthcare provision included annual HbA1c, renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]), blood pressure (BP), retinopathy, and neuropathy testing. Variables potentially associated with disparity outcomes were assessed using mixed effects logistic and linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), and nested using random effects within general practices. Ethnicity was defined using the Office for National Statistics ethnicity categories: White, Mixed, Asian, Black, and Other (including Arab people and other groups not classified elsewhere). From the primary care adult population (n = 1,238,909), we identified a cohort of 84,452 (5.29%) adults with T2D. The mean age of people with T2D in the included cohort at 31 December 2016 was 68.7 ± 12.6 years; 21,656 (43.9%) were female. The mean body mass index was 30.7 ± SD 6.4 kg/m2. The most deprived groups (IMD quintiles 1 and 2) showed poorer HbA1c than the least deprived (IMD quintile 5). People of Black ethnicity had worse HbA1c than those of White ethnicity. Asian individuals were less likely than White individuals to be prescribed insulin (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.95; p 0.01), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.79; p 0.001), and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.31–0.44; p 0.001). Black individuals were less likely than White ind

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Disparities_in_glycaemic_control_monitoring_and_treatment_of_type_2_diabetes_in_England_A_retrospective_cohort_analysis/9945311）。