血糖仪与生化分析仪对比：结果可比且临床风险可忽略

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Glucometer versus analyzer: comparable results with negligible clinical risk
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.28445421.v1
• 发布日期：2025-02-19
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：1.17 MB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Glucometer_versus_analyzer_comparable_results_with_negligible_clinical_risk/28445421

命令行下载

curl -L -o "iclb_a_2456917_sm8647.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/52473918"
curl -L -o "iclb_a_2456917_sm8646.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/52473921"

文件清单

• iclb_a_2456917_sm8647.docx（442.40 KB）
• iclb_a_2456917_sm8646.docx（723.24 KB）

文件总体积 1.17 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

This study assessed the reliability of Roche Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers in a real-world setting. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 6,695 paired results. Capillary samples were tested using Roche Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers, while venous samples were analyzed using Roche Cobas c503/702 analyzers. Compliance was assessed using modified criteria based on the ISO 15197 guideline and the CLSI EP09-A3 guideline using Passing-Bablok regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and Surveillance Error Grid (SEG) analysis. The overall compliance of glucometer results within ±15% or 0.83 mmol/L (15 mg/dL) of the reference method was 81.5%, below the acceptance criterion of 94.6%. SEG analysis showed that 90.3% of the paired results fell within the No-risk zone, with less than 0.001% in the moderate/lower-risk zone. The Emergency Department results indicated 87.8% overall compliance and 92.2% of pairs falling in the No-risk zone. Based on the regression analysis, the glucometer results showed a positive constant bias of nearly 0.33 mmol/L (6 mg/dL). The Bland-Altman plots showed a positive mean difference of 0.43 mmol/L for results ≤5.55 mmol/L (≤100 mg/dL) and a positive mean percentage difference of 3.77% for results >5.55 mmol/L (>100 mg/dL), within the permissible deviation. The compliance values ranged from 76.0% to 90.3% for clinical concentration groups, with the highest compliance found between >16.65–22.20 mmol/L (>300–400 mg/dL). The Accu-Chek Inform II glucometers demonstrated in real-world reliability, with most results falling within acceptable risk categories. However, compliance still needs improvement, so manufacturers should assess opportunities for advancement.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.28445421.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Glucometer_versus_analyzer_comparable_results_with_negligible_clinical_risk/28445421）。