公共健康服务中腹腔镜与开放阑尾切除术的结果和成本效果比较数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Comparison of outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic and open appendectomies in public health services
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.19923682.v1
• 发布日期：2022-05-30
• 文件数：8 个
• 文件总体积：77.82 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_outcomes_and_cost-effectiveness_of_laparoscopic_and_open_appendectomies_in_public_health_services/19923682

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416279"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416282"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416285"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416288"
curl -L -o "Table_5.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416291"
curl -L -o "Table_6.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416294"
curl -L -o "Table_7.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416297"
curl -L -o "Table_8.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35416300"

文件清单

• Table_1.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_2.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_3.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_4.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_5.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_6.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_7.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_8.xls（9.73 KB）

文件总体积 77.82 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of abdominal emergency surgery worldwide and appendectomy continues to be the definitive treatment of choice. This cost-effectiveness analysis evaluates laparoscopic versus open appendectomies performed in public health services in the state of Bahia (Brazil). We conducted a retrospective observational study using the database from the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (DATASUS). Available data on appendectomies between 2008 and 2019 were included, and we evaluated the temporal trend of hospital admissions, procedure-related mortality rates, length of stay, and costs. Statistical analysis was performed using the R-software (R Foundation, v.4.0.3) and the BioEstat software (IMDS, v. 5.3), considering p<0.05 as significant. During 2008-2019, 53,024 appendectomies were performed in the public health services in Bahia, of which 94.9% were open surgeries. The open technique was associated with a higher mortality rate (4.9/1,000 procedures; p<0.05) and a higher risk of death (RR=4.5; p<0.05) compared to laparoscopy (1.1/1,000 procedures). Laparoscopic appendectomy (median of 2.7 days) had a shorter length of stay compared to laparotomy (median of 4.15 days) (p<0.05). There was no difference in the medians of costs nor hospital services, per procedure (p=0.08 and p=0.08, respectively). Laparoscopic professional median costs were higher by US$ 1.39 (p<0.05). Minimally invasive surgery for appendicitis is a safe and efficacious procedure in Brazilian public health care services, as it provides advantages over the open method (including lower procedure-related mortality rate and earlier discharges), and it did not imply higher expenses for public service budgets in the state of Bahia.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.19923682.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_outcomes_and_cost-effectiveness_of_laparoscopic_and_open_appendectomies_in_public_health_services/19923682）。