胆道良性狭窄中自膨式金属支架与多塑料支架置入术后胰腺炎发生率的荟萃分析数据集
该数据集基于6项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,比较了两种支架在胆道良性狭窄中引发ERCP术后胰腺炎的风险及其他临床结局。

基本信息
资源简介
胆道良性狭窄中自膨式金属支架与多塑料支架置入术后胰腺炎发生率的荟萃分析数据集
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 2 个文件、合计 51.39 KB,主题涵盖 Benign biliary strictures、covered self-expandable metallic stents、multiple plastic stents、post-ERCP pancreatitis、meta-analysis,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs more frequently in self-expandable metallic stents than multiple plastic stents on benign biliary strictures: a meta-analysis》。配套论文《Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs more frequently in self-expandable metallic stents than multiple plastic stents on benign biliary strictures: a meta-analysis》发表于 Annals of Medicine(2022),DOI:10.1080/07853890.2022.2105395。项目资助方:This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [No. 20212BAB206024], and science and technology research project of Education of Jiangxi provincial [No. GJJ190029].。源站首次发布:2022-09-07。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:The occurrence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) after using covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) and multiple plastic stents (MPS) in the therapy of benign biliary strictures (BBS) remains ambiguous, this analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the included studies were published between 20…
中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):在内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后使用覆膜自膨式金属支架(CSEMS)和多根塑料支架(MPS)治疗良性胆道狭窄(BBS)时,术后胰腺炎(PEP)的发生情况仍不明确,本分析旨在评估相关结局。 对电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)进行了系统检索,纳入随机对照试验(RCT),纳入的研究发表于2008年至2021年间。主要结局为PEP,次要结局为狭窄消退、复发、总体不良事件、费用和ERCP次数。根据异质性采用随机效应模型或固定效应模型计算合并效应量。 最终纳入6项RCT,共444例患者(221例使用CSEMS,223例使用MPS)进入荟萃分析。本分析显示,与MPS相比,CSEMS更易发生PEP(OR[比值比]=3.34,95%置信区间[CI]:1.44-7.77,p=.005)。CSEMS所需ERCP次数更少(平均差[MD]:-1.56;95%CI:-2.66,-0.46,p=.006)。两种支架类型在狭窄消退和复发方面差异无统计学意义(OR=0.87,95%CI:0.49-1.56,p=.64;OR=2.3,95%CI:0.68-7.76,p=.18)。CSEMS组与MPS组的总体不良事件发生率相当(OR=1.49,95%CI:0.97-2.29,p=.07)。 与MPS相比,CSEMS导致PEP发生率显著升高,但ERCP操作次数更少,而狭窄消退率、复发率和总体不良事件发生率相当。在BBS患者置入CSEMS时,应进一步评估PEP的预防方法。 PROSPERO CRD42022314864。 关键信息 CSEMS和MPS置入仍是BBS患者的主要治疗手段,且支架置入后的严重并发症尚未进行比较。 与MPS相比,CSEMS置入后PEP发生率更高。 在BBS患者置入CSEMS时,应评估PEP的预防方法。 CSEMS和MPS置入仍…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 2 个,合计 51.39 KB。iann_a_2105395_sm4262.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,18.72 KB。iann_a_2105395_sm4261.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,32.67 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.21023910.v1。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Biochemistry、Medicine、Genetics、Physiology、Biotechnology、Immunology。主题标签:Benign biliary strictures、covered self-expandable metallic stents、multiple plastic stents、post-ERCP pancreatitis、meta-analysis。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Post-ERCP_pancreatitis_occurs_more_frequently_in_self-expandable_metallic_stents_than_multiple_plastic_stents_on_benign_biliary_strictures_a_meta-analysis/21023910
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs more frequently in self-expandable metallic stents than multiple plastic stents on benign biliary strictures: a meta-analysis. Taylor & Francis. Yang, Hui; Yang, Zhenzhen; Hong, Junbo
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2025-09-08,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs more frequently in self-expandable metallic stents than multiple plastic stents on benign biliary strictures: a meta-analysis
- DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.21023910.v1
- 发布日期:2022-09-07
- 文件数:2 个
- 文件总体积:51.39 KB
- 源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Post-ERCP_pancreatitis_occurs_more_frequently_in_self-expandable_metallic_stents_than_multiple_plastic_stents_on_benign_biliary_strictures_a_meta-analysis/21023910
命令行下载
curl -L -o "iann_a_2105395_sm4262.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/37332687"
curl -L -o "iann_a_2105395_sm4261.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/37332690"
文件清单
iann_a_2105395_sm4262.docx(18.72 KB)iann_a_2105395_sm4261.docx(32.67 KB)
文件总体积 51.39 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
The occurrence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) after using covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) and multiple plastic stents (MPS) in the therapy of benign biliary strictures (BBS) remains ambiguous, this analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes.
A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the included studies were published between 2008 and 2021. The primary outcome was PEP, while the secondary outcomes were stricture resolution, recurrence, overall adverse events, costs, and ERCP sessions. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with the random-effects model or fixed-effects model depending on the heterogeneity.
Six RCTs contained 444 patients (221 with CSEMS, 223 with MPS) finally included in the meta-analysis. The present analysis shows that compared to MPS, PEP is more likely to occur in CSEMS (OR [odds ratio] = 3.34, 95% confidence intervals [CI]:1.44–7.77, p = .005). CSEMS needs fewer ERCP sessions (Mean Deviation [MD]: −1.56; 95%CI:−2.66, −0.46], p = .006). The difference in stricture resolution and recurrence was not significant between the two stent types (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.49–1.56, p = .64; and OR = 2.3, 95%CI: 0.68–7.76, p = .18). The incidence of overall adverse events was comparable between CSEMS and the MPS group (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.97–2.29, p = .07).
Compared with MPS, CSEMS caused a significantly higher incidence of PEP but fewer ERCP procedures, while the rate of stricture resolution, recurrence, and overall adverse events were comparable. Prevention methods of PEP should be further evaluated in BBS when undergoing CSEMS placement.
PROSPERO CRD42022314864.
Key messages
CSEMS and MPS placement remain a mainstay for patients with BBS, and severe complications after stent placement have not been compared.
The incidence of PEP was higher after deployment of CSEMS compared to MPS.
Prevention methods of PEP should be evaluated in BBS when undergoing CSEMS placement.
CSEMS and MPS placement remain a mainstay for patients with BBS, and severe complications after stent placement have not
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.21023910.v1(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Post-ERCP_pancreatitis_occurs_more_frequently_in_self-expandable_metallic_stents_than_multiple_plastic_stents_on_benign_biliary_strictures_a_meta-analysis/21023910)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




