自动同步胸骨-胸部心肺复苏装置与LUCAS在猪心脏骤停模型中的血流动力学效应和复苏结局比较

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0221965
• 发布日期：2019-08-30
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：1.31 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_hemodynamic_effects_and_resuscitation_outcomes_between_automatic_simultaneous_sterno-thoracic_cardiopulmonary_resuscitation_device_and_LUCAS_in_a_swine_model_of_cardiac_arrest/9753956

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0221965.s001.GIF" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17473427"
curl -L -o "pone.0221965.s002.gif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/17473430"

文件清单

• pone.0221965.s001.GIF（63.73 KB）
• pone.0221965.s002.gif（1.25 MB）

文件总体积 1.31 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction
Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices are widely used to rescue patients from cardiac arrest. This study aimed to compare hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between a motor-driven, automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and the Lund University cardiac arrest system (LUCAS).
Material and methods
After 2 minutes of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation (VF), Yorkshire pigs (weight 35–60 kg) received CPR with an automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic CPR device (X-CPR group, n = 13) or the Lund University cardiac arrest system (LUCAS group, n = 12). Basic life support for 6 minutes and advanced cardiovascular life support for 12 minutes, including defibrillation and epinephrine administration, were provided. Hemodynamic parameters and resuscitation outcomes, including return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 24-hour survival, and cerebral performance category (CPC) at 24 hours, were evaluated.
Results
Hemodynamic parameters, including aortic pressures, coronary perfusion pressure, carotid blood flow, and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure were not significantly different between the two groups. Resuscitation outcomes were also not significantly different between the groups (X-CPR vs. LUCAS; rate of ROSC: 31% vs 25%, p = 1.000; 24-hour survival rate: 31% vs 17%, p = 0.645; neurological outcome with CPC ≤2: 31% vs 17%, p = 0.645). Also no significant difference in incidence complications associated with resuscitation was found between the groups.
Conclusions
CPR with a motor-driven X-CPR and CPR with the LUCAS produced similar hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0221965（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_hemodynamic_effects_and_resuscitation_outcomes_between_automatic_simultaneous_sterno-thoracic_cardiopulmonary_resuscitation_device_and_LUCAS_in_a_swine_model_of_cardiac_arrest/9753956）。