冠状动脉旁路移植造影术的右桡动脉入路与左桡动脉入路及股动脉入路的有效性和安全性：一项回顾性对比研究

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Efficacy and Safety of “Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography” with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.7773539.v1
• 发布日期：2019-02-27
• 文件数：10 个
• 文件总体积：1.47 MB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Coronary_Artery_Bypass_Graft_Angiography_with_Right_Transradial_Access_versus_Left_Transradial_Access_and_Femoral_Access_a_Retrospective_Comparative_Study/7773539

命令行下载

curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473667"
curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473673"
curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473679"
curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf05.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473682"
curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf06.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473685"
curl -L -o "0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf04.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473688"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473691"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14473694"

文件清单

• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf01.jpg（501.78 KB）
• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf02.jpg（529.35 KB）
• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf03.jpg（208.96 KB）
• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf05.jpg（10.59 KB）
• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf06.jpg（10.91 KB）
• 0102-7638-rbccv-34-01-0048-gf04.jpg（183.39 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_4.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 1.47 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Objective: Over the past 10 years, the rate of patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has increased twofold in cases of coronary angiography. Today, transradial access is the first choice for coronary angiography. We aimed to compare the efficacy and reliability of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography in post-CABG surgery in this study. Methods: Data from 442 patients who underwent post-CABG surgery between 2012-2017 were retrospectively compared. The right radial route was used in 120 cases, the left radial route in 148, and femoral route in 174. These three pathways were compared in terms of procedure time and fluoroscopy time, efficacy, and complication development. Comparisons among the three groups were performed with Bonferroni test for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher’'s exact test for nominal variables as a binary. Results: Comparison results indicate that femoral access was better than left radial access and the left radial access was better than right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time (10.71±1.65, 10.94±1.25, 16.12±5.28 min, P<0.001) and total procedure time (17.28±1.68, 17.68±2.34, 23.04±5.84 min, P<0.001). The left radial pathway was the most effective way of viewing left internal mammary artery (LIMA). No statistically significant differences were found among the three groups in other graft visualizations, all minor complications, total procedure and fluoroscopy time “Except LIMA imaging”. Mortality due to processing was not observed in all three groups. Conclusion: The left radial route is preferred over right radial access for post-CABG angiography because the left radial pathway is close to the LIMA and is similar to the femoral pathway. In LIMA graft imaging, right radial access is a reliable route, even though it is not as effective as other pathways. We hope that the right radial pathway will improve with physician experience and innovations.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.7773539.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Coronary_Artery_Bypass_Graft_Angiography_with_Right_Transradial_Access_versus_Left_Transradial_Access_and_Femoral_Access_a_Retrospective_Comparative_Study/7773539）。