远端经桡动脉入路降低冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉闭塞发生率荟萃分析数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：<b>Distal transradial approach reduced the incidence of radial artery occlusion for</b><b>coronary diagnostic</b><b>or interventional catheterization compared with conventional transradial approach: a meta-analysis</b>
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.27310818.v1
• 发布日期：2024-10-27
• 文件数：3 个
• 文件总体积：1.45 MB
• 源站页面：https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_b_Distal_transradial_approach_reduced_the_incidence_of_radial_artery_occlusion_for_b_b_coronary_diagnostic_b_b_or_interventional_catheterization_compared_with_conventional_transradial_approach_a_meta-analysis_b_/27310818

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Supplementary Material..pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50017716"
curl -L -o "Tables.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50017719"
curl -L -o "figures.zip" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50017722"

文件清单

• Supplementary Material..pdf（129.33 KB）
• Tables.docx（67.97 KB）
• figures.zip（1.25 MB）

文件总体积 1.45 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

Introduction: This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of distal transradial approach (dTRA) in coronary diagnostic or interventional catheterization compared with conventional transradial approach (cTRA).Materials and methods: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched from the establishment of the databases to April 13, 2024, for articles studying dTRA compared to cTRA in coronary diagnostic or interventional catheterization. Meta-analyses of radial artery occlusion (RAO), procedure success, successful catheter puncture, puncture in a single attempt, hematoma, radial artery spasm, puncture point bleeding, puncture time, procedural time, dosage of contrast medium, and hemostasis time.Results: Totally 31 studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with cTRA, dTRA significantly reduced the incidence of RAO (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.50, P<0.00001), hematoma (OR=0.67, 95%CI:0.56,0.80, P<0.0001) and short hemostasis time (MD=-0.43, 95%CI:-0.65,-0.20,P=0.0002), but had significantly low procedure success (OR=0.41, 95%CI:0.30,0.56,P<0.00001), low successful catheter puncture (OR=0.44, 95%CI:0.27,0.71,P=0.0009) and longer puncture time (MD=0.60, 95%CI:0.44,0.75,P<0.00001). There was no significant difference in puncture in a single attempt, radial artery spasm, puncture point bleeding, procedural time, dosage of contrast medium.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27310818.v1（source: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_b_Distal_transradial_approach_reduced_the_incidence_of_radial_artery_occlusion_for_b_b_coronary_diagnostic_b_b_or_interventional_catheterization_compared_with_conventional_transradial_approach_a_meta-analysis_b_/27310818）。