Base-case results.
该数据集提供泰国中重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者SUAVR与CAVR治疗的成本效用分析基线结果。
基本信息
资源简介
Base-case results.
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集，收录 1 个文件、合计 5.63 KB，主题涵盖 sensitivity analyses indicated、reducing surgery time、probabilistic sensitivity analyses、part constructed model、minimally invasive surgery，可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析，CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
源站首次发布：2024-01-19。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述：Background Sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) has become an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) treatment due to its advantages in reducing surgery time and improving outcomes. This study aimed to assess the cost-utility of SUAVR vs. CAVR treatment for patients with moderate to severe AS in Thailand. Methods A two-part constructed model was used to estimate the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) fr…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个，合计 5.63 KB。Table 3.xls：application/vnd.ms-excel，5.63 KB。数据集 DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0296875.t003。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类：Medicine、Pharmacology、Biotechnology、Ecology、Cancer、Infectious Diseases。主题标签：sensitivity analyses indicated、reducing surgery time、probabilistic sensitivity analyses、part constructed model、minimally invasive surgery、important issues related、small aortic root、lower health outcomes、inferior health outcomes、vs thb 1。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Base-case_results_/25032541
使用许可：CC BY 4.0（https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/）。
规范引用：Permsuwan, Unchalee; Singhatanadgige, Seri; Boonpipattanapong, Kawinnooch; Slisatkorn, Worawong; Chartrungsan, Angsu; Nitayavardhana, Prompak; et al. (2024). Base-case results.. PLOS ONE. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载，适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档，适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务（收技术服务费，非数据销售）
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管，完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取（Figshare）
- 源站标题：Base-case results.
- DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0296875.t003
- 发布日期：2024-01-19
- 文件数：1 个
- 文件总体积：5.63 KB
- 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Base-case_results_/25032541
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Table 3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/44156509"
文件清单
Table 3.xls（5.63 KB）
文件总体积 5.63 KB（源站 API 实测）。
数据说明
Background
Sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) has become an alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) treatment due to its advantages in reducing surgery time and improving outcomes. This study aimed to assess the cost-utility of SUAVR vs. CAVR treatment for patients with moderate to severe AS in Thailand.
Methods
A two-part constructed model was used to estimate the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from both societal and healthcare perspectives. Data on short-term mortality, complications, cost, and utility data were obtained from the Thai population. Long-term clinical data were derived from clinical studies. Costs and QALYs were discounted annually at 3% and presented as 2022 values. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to determine additional cost per QALY gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Results
SUAVR treatment incurred higher costs compared with CAVR treatment from both societal (THB 1,733,355 [USD 147,897] vs THB 1,220,643 [USD 104,150]) and healthcare provider perspectives (THB 1,594,174 [USD 136,022] vs THB 1,065,460 [USD 90,910]). In addition, SUAVR treatment resulted in lower health outcomes, with 6.20 life-years (LYs) and 4.95 QALYs, while CAVR treatment achieved 6.29 LYs and 5.08 QALYs. SUAVR treatment was considered as a dominated treatment strategy using both perspectives. Sensitivity analyses indicated the significant impact of changes in utilities and long-term mortality on the model.
Conclusion
SUAVR treatment is not a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with CAVR treatment for patients with moderate-severe AS in Thailand, as it leads to higher costs and inferior health outcomes. Other important issues related to specific patients such as those with minimally invasive surgery, those undergoing AVR with concomitant procedures, and those with calcified and small aortic root should be taken into account.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0296875.t003（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Base-case_results_/25032541）。
数据缺失？
依托陕西、四川两大基地，我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系，覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程，为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务？立即联系我们获取专业方案。
