稳定型冠状动脉疾病的治疗：成本效益研究的网络荟萃分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Treatment for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Studies
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0098371
• 发布日期：2014-06-04
• 文件数：8 个
• 文件总体积：1.27 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Treatment_for_Stable_Coronary_Artery_Disease_A_Network_Meta_Analysis_of_Cost_Effectiveness_Studies_/1046183

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Figure_S1.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521172"
curl -L -o "Figure_S2.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521173"
curl -L -o "Figure_S3.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521174"
curl -L -o "Table_S1.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521175"
curl -L -o "Table_S2.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521176"
curl -L -o "Table_S3.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521177"
curl -L -o "Table_S4.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521178"
curl -L -o "Checklist_S1.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1521179"

文件清单

• Figure_S1.doc（421.89 KB）
• Figure_S2.doc（22.53 KB）
• Figure_S3.doc（152.58 KB）
• Table_S1.doc（40.45 KB）
• Table_S2.doc（124.93 KB）
• Table_S3.doc（34.82 KB）
• Table_S4.doc（400.38 KB）
• Checklist_S1.doc（76.80 KB）

文件总体积 1.27 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction and Objectives
Numerous studies have assessed cost-effectiveness of different treatment modalities for stable angina. Direct comparisons, however, are uncommon. We therefore set out to compare the efficacy and mean cost per patient after 1 and 3 years of follow-up, of the following treatments as assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCT): medical therapy (MT), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without stent (PTCA), with bare-metal stent (BMS), with drug-eluting stent (DES), and elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Methods
RCT comparing at least two of the five treatments and reporting clinical and cost data were identified by a systematic search. Clinical end-points were mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). The costs described in the different trials were standardized and expressed in US $ 2008, based on purchasing power parity. A network meta-analysis was used to compare costs.
Results
Fifteen RCT were selected. Mortality and MI rates were similar in the five treatment groups both for 1-year and 3-year follow-up. Weighted cost per patient however differed markedly for the five treatment modalities, at both one year and three years (PConclusions
Appreciable savings in health expenditures can be achieved by using MT in the management of patients with stable angina.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0098371（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Treatment_for_Stable_Coronary_Artery_Disease_A_Network_Meta_Analysis_of_Cost_Effectiveness_Studies_/1046183）。