急性心肌梗死治疗的医院选择

该数据集包含740名受访者关于急性心肌梗死治疗中医院选择影响因素的调查数据,涵盖公众报告知晓度及选择变化。

Figshare
2025-05-27 更新
浏览 26
表格thorough validity checksurvey questions includeacute myocardial infarctionpeople &amp;# 82177 %) livedami symptoms occurhospital </ p7 years&amp;# 8216xlink ">university degreepublic reporting
Hospital choice for AMI treatment.

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000009728 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2025-05-27
版本
v1

资源简介

急性心肌梗死治疗的医院选择

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Hospital choice for AMI treatment.》。配套论文《The effect of public reporting of acute myocardial infarction on the choice of hospital》发表于 PLOS One(2025),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323780。源站首次发布:2025-05-27。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:This study is to investigate the effect of public reporting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care on the people’s choice of hospitals. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire. The survey questions include the awareness and usage of public reporting, and the impact of the public reporting on the choice of hospitals. The difference in responses before and after acquiring information about public reporting was compared using multinomial logistic regression. Following…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个,合计 9.73 KB。Table 3.xls:application/vnd.ms-excel,9.73 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323780.t003。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Biotechnology、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified、Science Policy。主题标签:thorough validity check、survey questions include、acute myocardial infarction、people &amp;# 8217、7 %) lived、ami symptoms occur、hospital </ p、7 years、&amp;# 8216、xlink ">。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Hospital_choice_for_AMI_treatment_/29157085

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Kim, Mira; Lee, Kyungshin; Chae, Kyunghee; Jung, Chai-Young; Lee, Sangmin; Quan, Hude; et al. (2025). Hospital choice for AMI treatment.. PLOS ONE. Dataset

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/54863155"

文件清单

  • Table 3.xls(9.73 KB)

文件总体积 9.73 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

This study is to investigate the effect of public reporting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care on the people’s choice of hospitals. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire. The survey questions include the awareness and usage of public reporting, and the impact of the public reporting on the choice of hospitals. The difference in responses before and after acquiring information about public reporting was compared using multinomial logistic regression. Following a thorough validity check, 740 respondents are included in the final survey data set. The average age of respondents was 38.7 years (SD: 11.8), with 75.3% being female. Age distribution was as follows: 26.3% in their 20s, 23.5% in their 30s, 30.0% in their 40s, and 20.2% in their 50s. Most participants (73.7%) lived in metropolitan areas, and 75.1% had a university degree or higher. Before providing information about public reporting of AMI care, 62.8% of respondents selected ‘nearby hospitals’ as the best option for AMI patients, followed by ‘famous hospitals’, ‘usual hospital’, and ‘hospitals with good rates’. Non-health-related occupation shows significantly changed results of hospital choice between before and after obtaining public reporting information (p < 0.001). Publicly available hospital quality ratings can influence people’s choice of hospital and increase the risk of selecting a hospital with a good rating than the nearest hospital which is recommended for AMI patients. Policy-makers need to stress the importance of choosing the nearest hospital when AMI symptoms occur in addition to hospital ratings in the public reporting.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0323780.t003(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Hospital_choice_for_AMI_treatment_/29157085)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案