STEMI患者转院与自行就诊对比分析

STEMI患者转院与自行就诊的临床数据表格,用于分析转运延迟对预后的影响。

SciELO journalsSciELO journals
DataCite Commons
2020-08-27 更新
浏览 17
表格AngioplastyBalloonCoronary/methodsMyocardial Reperfusion/methodsFibrinolytic AgentsIntensive Care Units
Comparative Analysis between Transferred and Self-Referred STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000591965 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2020-08-27
版本
v1

资源简介

STEMI患者转院与自行就诊对比分析

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 4 个文件、合计 591.97 KB,主题涵盖 Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods、Myocardial Reperfusion/methods、Fibrinolytic Agents、Intensive Care Units,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Comparative Analysis between Transferred and Self-Referred STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty》。配套论文《Comparative Analysis between Transferred and Self-Referred STEMI Patients

Undergoing Primary Angioplasty》发表于 Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia(2019),DOI:10.5935/abc.20190014。源站首次发布:2019-04-24。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Abstract Background: Studies have shown the benefits of rapid reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. However, there are still delays during transport of patients to primary angioplasty. Objective: To evaluate whether there is a difference in total ischemic time between patients transferred from other hospitals compared to self-referred patients in our institution. Methods: Historical cohort study including patients with acute myocardial infarction treated between April 2014 and Sept…

中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):摘要 背景:研究表明,急性心肌梗死患者可从快速再灌注治疗中获益。然而,患者在转运至直接血管成形术的过程中仍存在延迟。目的:评估在本机构中,由其他医院转运而来的患者与自行就诊患者之间,总缺血时间是否存在差异。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入2014年4月至2015年9月期间接受治疗的急性心肌梗死患者。患者被分为转运患者(A组)和自行就诊患者(B组)。患者的临床特征来自本机构电子数据库,转运时间根据急诊科收到请求转运患者的电子邮件时间进行估算。结果:样本共纳入621例患者,A组215例,B组406例。两组的人群特征相似。A组从症状发作到到达急诊科的时间显著更长(A组385分钟 vs. B组307分钟,p < 0.001),转运延迟为147分钟。转运距离与转运时间增加之间存在显著相关性(R = 0.55,p < 0.001)。然而,两组之间未发现死亡率差异。结论:在其他城市转运接受心肌梗死治疗的患者中,转运时间长于推荐时间,尤其是在转运距离较长时更为明显。

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 4 个,合计 591.97 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.8031398.v1。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Cardiology。主题标签:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods、Myocardial Reperfusion/methods、Fibrinolytic Agents、Intensive Care Units。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparative_Analysis_between_Transferred_and_Self-Referred_STEMI_Patients_Undergoing_Primary_Angioplasty/8031398

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Balk, Maurício; Gomes, Henrique Basso; Quadros, Alexandre Schaan de; Saffi, Marco Aurélio Lumertz; Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz (2019). Comparative Analysis between Transferred and Self-Referred STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty. SciELO journals. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-03,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14959655"
curl -L -o "0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14959658"
curl -L -o "0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14959661"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14959664"

文件清单

  • 0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf01.jpg(306.22 KB)
  • 0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf02.jpg(131.97 KB)
  • 0066-782X-abc-112-04-0402-gf03.jpg(148.14 KB)
  • Table_1.xls(5.63 KB)

文件总体积 591.97 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Background: Studies have shown the benefits of rapid reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. However, there are still delays during transport of patients to primary angioplasty. Objective: To evaluate whether there is a difference in total ischemic time between patients transferred from other hospitals compared to self-referred patients in our institution. Methods: Historical cohort study including patients with acute myocardial infarction treated between April 2014 and September 2015. Patients were divided into transferred patients (group A) and self-referred patients (group B). Clinical characteristics of the patients were obtained from our electronic database and the transfer time was estimated based on the time the e-mail requesting patient’'s transference was received by the emergency department. Results: The sample included 621 patients, 215 in group A and 406 in group B. Population characteristics were similar in both groups. Time from symptom onset to arrival at the emergency department was significantly longer in group A (385 minutes vs. 307 minutes for group B, p < 0.001) with a transfer delay of 147 minutes. There was a significant relationship between the travel distance and increased transport time (R = 0.55, p < 0.001). However, no difference in mortality was found between the groups. Conclusion: In patients transferred from other cities for treatment of infarction, transfer time was longer than that recommended, especially in longer travel distances.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.8031398.v1(source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparative_Analysis_between_Transferred_and_Self-Referred_STEMI_Patients_Undergoing_Primary_Angioplasty/8031398)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案